in a group discussion which statement ost clearly uses evidence to support the conclusion
the mayors use of the term trash to describe are is proof of his feelings
the mayers opinion while clearly emotional is grounded in some good points
the mayor showed everyone his low opinion of abstract alternative art
the mayor will never approve funding for a modern are gallery no matter what
The statement "the mayor will never approve funding for a modern art gallery no matter what" most clearly uses evidence to support the conclusion.
The statement that most clearly uses evidence to support the conclusion is: "The mayor's use of the term trash to describe art is proof of his feelings."
In a group discussion, the statement that most clearly uses evidence to support the conclusion is: "The mayor will never approve funding for a modern art gallery no matter what."
To determine which statement uses evidence to support the conclusion, we need to look for specific facts, data, or examples that are provided. Let's analyze each statement:
1. "The mayor's use of the term trash to describe art is proof of his feelings."
- This statement does not provide any evidence or specific examples to support the conclusion. It only mentions the mayor's use of a derogatory term, which is grammatically incorrect ("are" should be "art") and does not constitute evidence.
2. "The mayor's opinion, while clearly emotional, is grounded in some good points."
- This statement suggests that the mayor's opinion is based on some valid arguments, but it does not provide any specific evidence or example to support this claim. It only acknowledges that there may be some good points without specifying what those points are.
3. "The mayor showed everyone his low opinion of abstract alternative art."
- Similar to the first statement, this one does not provide any evidence or specific examples. It merely mentions the mayor's low opinion without offering any concrete evidence to support the conclusion.
4. "The mayor will never approve funding for a modern art gallery no matter what."
- This statement is the most likely to use evidence to support the conclusion. By stating that the mayor will never approve funding for a modern art gallery, it implies that there is a history or pattern of the mayor consistently rejecting such proposals. This can be seen as evidence based on past actions or decisions.
Therefore, the statement that most clearly uses evidence to support the conclusion is the fourth one: "The mayor will never approve funding for a modern art gallery no matter what."