which of te following best explains why positions in a company should be reviewd on a regular basis
because jobs change over time with changes in technology departmental organization and personnel shifts
because many employees spend more time on actual responsibilties and tasks than on hidden tasks
because positions mist be occasionally reproduced to create a necessary amount of redundancy
because the company may need to adopt a different organizational structure in order to keep up with competitors
The best explanation among the given options is:
- Because jobs change over time with changes in technology, departmental organization, and personnel shifts
Regularly reviewing positions in a company is crucial because the nature of work is not static. Technology advancements, changes in organizational structures, and shifts in personnel can significantly impact job responsibilities and requirements. Therefore, a periodic review ensures that positions are aligned with the evolving needs of the company and helps ensure that employees are equipped to handle their roles effectively.
The most appropriate explanation for why positions in a company should be reviewed on a regular basis is:
"Because jobs change over time with changes in technology, departmental organization, and personnel shifts."
Regularly reviewing positions allows companies to ensure that job descriptions and responsibilities are up to date with evolving technological advancements, changes in departmental structure, and shifts in personnel. This helps to ensure that employees are aligned with the current needs and objectives of the company.
The best explanation for why positions in a company should be reviewed on a regular basis is: "because jobs change over time with changes in technology, departmental organization, and personnel shifts." This explanation highlights the importance of keeping up with the dynamic nature of work environments.
To understand the reasoning behind this, consider the following points:
1. Changes in Technology: In today's fast-paced world, technology is constantly evolving. This means that the skills and knowledge required for a particular job may become outdated. By regularly reviewing positions, companies can identify the need for new skills or training to keep up with technological advancements.
2. Departmental Organization: Companies go through various changes in their internal structure, such as mergers, acquisitions, and reorganizations. These changes can impact the roles and responsibilities of employees within the organization. Regular reviews of positions ensure that job descriptions align with the new departmental structure and responsibilities.
3. Personnel Shifts: Employee turnover is a common occurrence, and it leads to shifts in the composition of the workforce. New employees may bring different skills and strengths to the table, and existing employees may develop new abilities over time. Regularly reviewing positions allows companies to reassess the skills required for each role and make necessary adjustments to maximize efficiency and productivity.
In contrast, the other options mentioned - spending more time on actual responsibilities and tasks than on hidden tasks, creating redundancy through position reproduction, and adopting a different organizational structure to keep up with competitors - might have some validity in certain situations, but they do not encompass the broad reasons for regular position reviews like the changing nature of jobs in relation to technology, departmental organization, and personnel shifts.