What best describes the process used by the Supreme Court to grant a writ of certiorari?(1 point)%0D%0AResponses%0D%0A%0D%0AA vote of four justices can grant a review of the case.%0D%0AA vote of four justices can grant a review of the case.%0D%0A%0D%0AA majority vote of five justices requires a review of the case.%0D%0AA majority vote of five justices requires a review of the case.%0D%0A%0D%0AThe court must review all cases where a review is requested.%0D%0AThe court must review all cases where a review is requested.%0D%0A%0D%0AA unanimous vote by the justices grants a review of the case.
A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case.
What type of jurisdiction gives the Supreme Court the authority to grant a writ of certiorari?(1 point)%0D%0AResponses%0D%0A%0D%0Aappellate jurisdiction%0D%0Aappellate jurisdiction%0D%0A%0D%0Aappellate and original jurisdiction%0D%0Aappellate and original jurisdiction%0D%0A%0D%0Aoriginal jurisdiction%0D%0Aoriginal jurisdiction%0D%0A%0D%0ARule 10%0D%0ARule 10
Appellate jurisdiction
What is the contrast between judicial restraint and judicial activism in the Supreme Court?(1 point)%0D%0AResponses%0D%0A%0D%0AJudicial restraint means the court reviews the action; judicial activism means the court does not get involved.%0D%0AJudicial restraint means the court reviews the action; judicial activism means the court does not get involved.%0D%0A%0D%0AJudicial restraint means the court takes ownership of the issues; judicial activism means the court has a lot of power.%0D%0AJudicial restraint means the court takes ownership of the issues; judicial activism means the court has a lot of power.%0D%0A%0D%0AJudicial restraint means the court does not get involved; judicial activism means the court reviews the action.%0D%0AJudicial restraint means the court does not get involved; judicial activism means the court reviews the action.%0D%0A%0D%0AJudicial restraint means the court does not include its own preferences; judicial activism means the court is silent on the issues of the branches.
Judicial restraint means the court does not get involved; judicial activism means the court reviews the action.
The correct response is: A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case.
The correct response is: A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case.
To understand more about the process used by the Supreme Court to grant a writ of certiorari, let's break it down:
1. Writ of Certiorari: A writ of certiorari is a legal order issued by the Supreme Court to review a lower court's decision. The purpose of this review is to determine whether there were any errors in the application of the law or any significant constitutional issues at stake.
2. Granting a Review: To grant a review, the Supreme Court needs to agree to hear a case. This is done by issuing a writ of certiorari. However, the Supreme Court is selective in deciding which cases to review due to its limited resources and significant caseload.
3. Vote of Four Justices: According to the Supreme Court's rules, a case will be granted a writ of certiorari if at least four of the nine justices agree to hear it. This requirement is known as the "rule of four." If four justices vote in favor of granting a review, the case moves forward for oral arguments and a possible decision.
It is important to note that a majority vote of five justices is not required to grant a writ of certiorari. The rule of four allows a minority group of justices to choose cases for review if they can gather enough support.
So, the statement "A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case" accurately describes the process used by the Supreme Court to grant a writ of certiorari.