Which of the following statements best compares the causes of absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy? (1 point)
• While both result in one main religion, there is more religious diversity under an absolute monarchy.
O While both usualy come out of disorder and chaos, a constitutional monarchy places legal checks on the power
While absolute monarchies only last for a short time, constitutional monarchies last for much longer.
• While constitutional monarchy means that a king must officially be invited by another governing body, absolute
monarchies can only be inherited.
The statement that best compares the causes of absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy is: While both usually come out of disorder and chaos, a constitutional monarchy places legal checks on the power.
The statement that best compares the causes of absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy is: "While both usually come out of disorder and chaos, a constitutional monarchy places legal checks on the power."
To determine which statement best compares the causes of absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy, we need to analyze the options given and understand the key differences between these two forms of government.
An absolute monarchy is a system of government where a monarch holds all the power and authority without any checks or balances. In contrast, a constitutional monarchy is a system where a monarch acts as a ceremonial figurehead, while the powers of governance rest with the elected officials and the constitution.
Let's evaluate each of the statements:
Option 1: "While both result in one main religion, there is more religious diversity under an absolute monarchy."
This statement does not directly address the causes of absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy. It focuses on the outcomes related to religious practices, rather than the reasons behind their establishment. Hence, this statement does not accurately compare the causes.
Option 2: "While both usually come out of disorder and chaos, a constitutional monarchy places legal checks on the power."
This statement correctly identifies that both absolute and constitutional monarchies can emerge from periods of disorder and chaos. However, the statement also highlights a crucial distinction - constitutional monarchy introduces legal checks on the monarch's power, which differentiates it from an absolute monarchy. Therefore, this statement provides a more accurate comparison of the causes.
Option 3: "While absolute monarchies only last for a short time, constitutional monarchies last for much longer."
This statement focuses on the duration of both forms of monarchy rather than their causes. While the longevity of constitutional monarchies is usually longer than absolute monarchies, this statement does not provide insights into the reasons behind their establishment. Thus, this statement is not an appropriate comparison of the causes.
Option 4: "While constitutional monarchy means that a king must officially be invited by another governing body, absolute monarchies can only be inherited."
This statement highlights the different methods of selecting a monarch in constitutional and absolute monarchies but does not address the causes. It focuses more on the mechanics of power succession rather than the reasons why these forms of governments came to be.
Based on the analysis, the statement that best compares the causes of absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy is: "While both usually come out of disorder and chaos, a constitutional monarchy places legal checks on the power." This statement recognizes the common origin of these forms of government and underscores the significant difference in the presence of legal checks in a constitutional monarchy.