Which of the following statements is accurate regarding the Three-Fifths Compromise and the issue of slavery? (1 point) Responses The compromise guaranteed that a person who escaped slavery could not be returned to an owner. The compromise guaranteed that a person who escaped slavery could not be returned to an owner. The compromise banned slavery only in Southern states. The compromise banned slavery only in Southern states. The compromise outlined how slavery would be abolished over the next 20 years. The compromise outlined how slavery would be abolished over the next 20 years. The compromise allowed the slave trade to continue for the next 20 years.
The compromise allowed the slave trade to continue for the next 20 years.
The accurate statement regarding the Three-Fifths Compromise and the issue of slavery is: The compromise allowed the slave trade to continue for the next 20 years.
The accurate statement regarding the Three-Fifths Compromise and the issue of slavery is:
"The compromise allowed the slave trade to continue for the next 20 years."
To understand why this statement is accurate, let's break down the Three-Fifths Compromise and its impact on the issue of slavery:
The Three-Fifths Compromise was a part of the United States Constitution, specifically Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3. It was reached during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 and addressed the issue of how enslaved individuals would be counted for determining a state's population and, consequently, political representation.
Under the compromise, enslaved individuals were counted as three-fifths of a person for the purpose of apportioning seats in the House of Representatives and for direct taxes levied by the federal government. This allowed for Southern states with large enslaved populations to have increased representation in Congress, despite the fact that enslaved individuals did not have voting rights or citizenship.
Importantly, the Three-Fifths Compromise did not ban slavery nor outline any plans for abolition. It was primarily concerned with determining representation and taxation. As such, the compromise did not guarantee the abolition of slavery or ban slavery in any state, whether Northern or Southern. It did, however, set a timeframe and conditions for the continuation of the international slave trade.
According to the compromise, the importation of slaves would be allowed for the following 20 years, until 1808. After that period, Congress would have the power to regulate or prohibit the international slave trade. Therefore, the compromise did not immediately end the slave trade but provided a window of time in which it could continue.
In summary, the Three-Fifths Compromise did not ban slavery or outline how it would be abolished. However, it did allow the slave trade to continue for the next 20 years before Congress gained the power to regulate or prohibit it. Therefore, the statement that accurately reflects the compromise's impact on slavery is that it allowed the slave trade to continue for the next 20 years.