Which statement illustrates bias in scientific research?(1 point)
Responses
A microbiologist publishes data funded by the National Institute of Health that does not support their original hypothesis.
A microbiologist publishes data funded by the National Institute of Health that does not support their original hypothesis.
An ecologist publishes data funded by a construction company which supports their original hypothesis that an endangered animal's territory is not endangered
An ecologist publishes data funded by a construction company which supports their original hypothesis that an endangered animal's territory is not endangered
A zoologist publishes incomplete data on sloths which supports their original hypothesis and notes that more research is required.
A zoologist publishes incomplete data on sloths which supports their original hypothesis and notes that more research is required.
A botanist publishes data about plant growth that does not support their original hypothesis and is replicable.
An ecologist publishes data funded by a construction company which supports their original hypothesis that an endangered animal's territory is not endangered
Which question can be used to evaluate reliability of a source?(1 point)
Responses
Is the data challenged by anyone in public?
Is the data challenged by anyone in public?
Is the research relevant to me?
Is the research relevant to me?
Is the research peer-reviewed?
Is the research peer-reviewed?
Is the author American?
Is the author American?
Is the research peer-reviewed?
The statement that illustrates bias in scientific research is:
An ecologist publishes data funded by a construction company which supports their original hypothesis that an endangered animal's territory is not endangered.
The statement that illustrates bias in scientific research is: "An ecologist publishes data funded by a construction company which supports their original hypothesis that an endangered animal's territory is not endangered."
To identify bias in scientific research, we need to look at the funding source and how it may influence the outcome. In this case, the ecologist's research is funded by a construction company, which has a vested interest in showing that the endangered animal's territory is not endangered. This financial relationship can potentially introduce bias into the research process and the interpretation of the results.
It is important for scientific research to be conducted independently and free from any conflicts of interest, such as funding from parties with a self-serving agenda. This ensures the reliability and credibility of the research findings.