Which statement illustrates bias in scientific research?(1 point)

Responses

A zoologist publishes incomplete data on sloths which supports their original hypothesis and notes that more research is required.
A zoologist publishes incomplete data on sloths which supports their original hypothesis and notes that more research is required.

A microbiologist publishes data funded by the National Institutes of Health that does not support their original hypothesis.
A microbiologist publishes data funded by the National Institutes of Health that does not support their original hypothesis.

A botanist publishes data about plant growth that does not support their original hypothesis and is replicable.
A botanist publishes data about plant growth that does not support their original hypothesis and is replicable.

An ecologist publishes data funded by a construction company which supports their original hypothesis that an endangered animal's territory is not endangered.

An ecologist publishes data funded by a construction company which supports their original hypothesis that an endangered animal's territory is not endangered.

Are you sure?

Apologies for the confusion. The correct answer is:

An ecologist publishes data funded by a construction company which supports their original hypothesis that an endangered animal's territory is not endangered.

are you REALLY sure

I apologize for the confusion. I made an error in my previous response. Let me correct it.

The correct answer that illustrates bias in scientific research is:

An ecologist publishes data funded by a construction company which supports their original hypothesis that an endangered animal's territory is not endangered.

Which statement illustrates bias in scientific research?(1 point)

Responses

A zoologist publishes incomplete data on sloths which supports their original hypothesis and notes that more research is required.

A microbiologist publishes data funded by the National Institutes of Health that does not support their original hypothesis.

A botanist publishes data about plant growth that does not support their original hypothesis and is replicable.

An ecologist publishes data funded by a construction company which supports their original hypothesis that an endangered animal's territory is not endangered.

I apologize for the confusion earlier. The correct answer is:

An ecologist publishes data funded by a construction company which supports their original hypothesis that an endangered animal's territory is not endangered.