Which of the following tables accurately distinguishes the short-term causes and long-term causes of Russification policies?(1 point)
Responses
Short-Term Causes Long-Term Causes
Gain a political and economic advantage
Gain state control
Develop a centralized Russian identity
Russia’s conflict with different territories
The loss in the Crimean War
The assassination of Alexander II
Short-Term Causes Long-Term Causes Gain a political and economic advantage Gain state control Develop a centralized Russian identity Russia’s conflict with different territories The loss in the Crimean War The assassination of Alexander II
Short-Term Causes Long-Term Causes
Develop a centralized Russian identity
Gain state control
The assassination of Alexander II
Russia’s conflict with different territories
The loss in the Crimean War
Gain a political and economic advantage
Short-Term Causes Long-Term Causes Develop a centralized Russian identity Gain state control The assassination of Alexander II Russia’s conflict with different territories The loss in the Crimean War Gain a political and economic advantage
Short-Term Causes Long-Term Causes
Russia’s conflict with different territories
The loss in the Crimean War
The assassination of Alexander II
Develop a centralized Russian identity
Gain state control
Gain a political and economic advantage
Short-Term Causes Long-Term Causes Russia’s conflict with different territories The loss in the Crimean War The assassination of Alexander II Develop a centralized Russian identity Gain state control Gain a political and economic advantage
Short-Term Causes Long-Term Causes
Russia’s conflict with different territories
The loss in the Crimean War
Gain a political and economic advantage
Develop a centralized Russian identity
The assassination of Alexander II
Gain state control
Short-Term Causes Long-Term Causes Russia’s conflict with different territories The loss in the Crimean War Gain a political and economic advantage Develop a centralized Russian identity The assassination of Alexander II Gain state control
Which statement best summarizes the U.S. foreign policy goals from the perspective of peacemaking?(1 point)
Responses
The U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to provide stability and peace in an unstable region.
U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to overthrow threats to U.S. citizens living in Latin America.
The U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to establish the U.S. as an imperial government in Latin American.
U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to retreat military forces to establish peace in the U.S.
The U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to provide stability and peace in an unstable region.
Which of the following charts best compares the goals of “big stick” diplomacy and dollar diplomacy?(1 point)
Responses
“Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy
End conflict with military intervention/force
Establish financial stability
Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America
End conflict peacefully
Reduced use of military intervention
Establish U.S. military power
Expand U.S. economic interests
“Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy End conflict with military intervention/force Establish financial stability Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America End conflict peacefully Reduced use of military intervention Establish U.S. military power Expand U.S. economic interests
“Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy
End conflict peacefully
Establish U.S. military power
Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America
End conflict peacefully
Reduce use of military intervention
Establish financial stability
Expand U.S. economic interests
“Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy End conflict peacefully Establish U.S. military power Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America End conflict peacefully Reduce use of military intervention Establish financial stability Expand U.S. economic interests
“Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy
End conflict with military
Establish financial stability
Reduced use of military intervention
Expand U.S. economic interests
End conflict by paying off aggressors
Establish U.S. military power
Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America
“Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy End conflict with military Establish financial stability Reduced use of military intervention Expand U.S. economic interests End conflict by paying off aggressors Establish U.S. military power Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America
“Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy
End conflict non-peacefully
Expand U.S. economic interests
Reduced use of military intervention
Establish financial stability
End conflict with military
Establish U.S. military power
Reinforce US control over Latin America
"Big Stick" Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy
End conflict non-peacefully Expand U.S. economic interests
Reduced use of military intervention Establish financial stability
Establish U.S. military power End conflict with military
Reinforce US control over Latin America
Which of the following constructs an anti-imperialist argument against annexation of the Philippines?(1 point)
Responses
Annexation of the Philippines would divide resources that should be spent on Americans in America.
Annexing the Philippines would provide America with direct access to Chinese markets.
Annexation of the Philippines could increase the U.S. geopolitical position.
Annexing the Philippines would go against American values of freedom and liberty.
Annexing the Philippines would go against American values of freedom and liberty.
Which of the following persons would most likely support an argument in favor of the U.S. annexation of the Philippines?(1 point)
Responses
a Japanese politician hoping to continue Pacific expansion
Mark Twain, founder and supporter of anti-imperialist groups
an American business owner looking to expand to Chinese markets
F. L. McGhee, the chairman of the Negro National Democratic League