Which statement best investigates the relationship between social Darwinism and New Imperialism?(1 point)

Responses

Social Darwinism believed that through the intermarriage of different peoples, the strongest and smartest would create the best governments.
Social Darwinism believed that through the intermarriage of different peoples, the strongest and smartest would create the best governments.

Social Darwinism portrayed African peoples as culturally unique and rejected their colonization by other nations.
Social Darwinism portrayed African peoples as culturally unique and rejected their colonization by other nations.

Social Darwinism portrayed White Europeans as culturally superior to other races and was used to justify the colonization of other nations.
Social Darwinism portrayed White Europeans as culturally superior to other races and was used to justify the colonization of other nations.

Social Darwinism focused exclusively on science and did not apply to the era of New Imperialism.

Social Darwinism portrayed White Europeans as culturally superior to other races and was used to justify the colonization of other nations.

Which of the following best describes why Ethiopia’s resistance to Italian imperialism was successful?(1 point)

Responses

Ethiopia was only valued by Italy to keep other Europeans from taking over more valuable African land.
Ethiopia was only valued by Italy to keep other Europeans from taking over more valuable African land.

Ethiopia was never colonized because it arranged a mutually beneficial relationship with the Italians.
Ethiopia was never colonized because it arranged a mutually beneficial relationship with the Italians.

European alliances gave Ethiopia time and resources to build up its military and infrastructure.
European alliances gave Ethiopia time and resources to build up its military and infrastructure.

Ethiopia relied on the Zulu nation in its conflict with Italy because Cetshwayo and Menelik were allies.

European alliances gave Ethiopia time and resources to build up its military and infrastructure.

Which statement correctly compares similarities between Ethiopia and Siam’s resistance to imperialism?(1 point)

Responses

Both nations became protectorates after a period of resistance.
Both nations became protectorates after a period of resistance.

Both nations used military resistance to prevent imperial expansion.
Both nations used military resistance to prevent imperial expansion.

Both nations used diplomatic treaties to prevent imperial expansion.
Both nations used diplomatic treaties to prevent imperial expansion.

Both nations used their Christian faith to gain favor with European nations.

Both nations used diplomatic treaties to prevent imperial expansion.

What two nations competed to include Siam in their sphere of influence?(1 point)

Responses

France and Great Britain
France and Great Britain

Great Britain and Italy
Great Britain and Italy

Italy and Ethiopia
Italy and Ethiopia

Netherlands and Great Britain
Netherlands and Great Britain

France and Great Britain

What distinguishes sound generalizations from misleading oversimplifications in historians’ work?(1 point)

Responses

Unlike generalizations, oversimplifications are always wrong.
Unlike generalizations, oversimplifications are always wrong.

Oversimplifications come from asking the wrong questions.
Oversimplifications come from asking the wrong questions.

comparisons between too many historical events
comparisons between too many historical events

the use of specific historic evidence

The use of specific historic evidence

The correct statement that investigates the relationship between social Darwinism and New Imperialism is:

- Social Darwinism portrayed White Europeans as culturally superior to other races and was used to justify the colonization of other nations.

To arrive at this answer, we need to understand what social Darwinism and New Imperialism are and then analyze the given options.

Social Darwinism is a belief system that applies Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection to human societies. It suggests that certain races or ethnic groups are more biologically fit and superior to others. This idea was used to justify colonialism and imperialism during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

New Imperialism refers to the period of renewed European colonial expansion during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. It was characterized by the scramble for territories in Africa, Asia, and other parts of the world.

Now, let's examine the given options:

Option 1: Social Darwinism believed that through the intermarriage of different peoples, the strongest and smartest would create the best governments.

This statement does not directly address the relationship between social Darwinism and New Imperialism. It talks about intermarriage and creating the best governments, which are not specific to imperialism.

Option 2: Social Darwinism portrayed African peoples as culturally unique and rejected their colonization by other nations.

This statement is incorrect. Social Darwinism did not reject the colonization of African peoples but, in fact, provided a mechanism to justify their colonization by portraying them as racially inferior.

Option 3: Social Darwinism portrayed White Europeans as culturally superior to other races and was used to justify the colonization of other nations.

This statement is correct. It accurately describes the relationship between social Darwinism and New Imperialism. Social Darwinism was often used to justify the colonization of other nations by asserting the superiority of White Europeans.

Option 4: Social Darwinism focused exclusively on science and did not apply to the era of New Imperialism.

This statement is incorrect. Social Darwinism was not limited to science alone; it had significant implications for the era of New Imperialism. It provided the ideological basis for European powers to expand their empires and establish colonies.

Therefore, the correct statement is Option 3: Social Darwinism portrayed White Europeans as culturally superior to other races and was used to justify the colonization of other nations.