Why was equal representation in the Articles of Confederation considered a weakness?
It gave both large and small states too much power.
It gave large states too much power.
It gave small states too much power.
It gave both large and small states too little power.
Equal representation in the Articles of Confederation was considered a weakness because it gave both large and small states too much power.
Equal representation in the Articles of Confederation was considered a weakness because it gave both large and small states too much power. In the Articles of Confederation, each state had an equal vote regardless of its size or population. This meant that a small state had the same amount of influence as a large state, which created an imbalance of power. As a result, smaller states could block or hinder important decisions made by the larger and more populous states, leading to gridlock and an inability to effectively govern the nation as a whole. This aspect of equal representation in the Articles of Confederation was later addressed and rectified in the creation of the United States Constitution, where a compromise was reached with the formation of a bicameral legislature - the House of Representatives, where representation is based on population, and the Senate, where each state is represented equally. This compromise helped to balance the influence of both large and small states, ensuring a more equitable distribution of power.
