Which of the following best explains the impact of the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk on Russia? (1 point)
A.Although Russia gave up a lot of land, the Russian people were relieved to exit the war.
B.The treaty negotiation showed how powerful the new Bolshevik government was.
C.The land Germany took from Russia cost the country resources and led to a new war.
D.The treaty did not affect the nation since it was undone after World War I ended.
A. Although Russia gave up a lot of land, the Russian people were relieved to exit the war.
The correct answer is A. Although Russia gave up a lot of land, the Russian people were relieved to exit the war.
To determine the best explanation of the impact of the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk on Russia, we need to consider the historical context and the consequences of the treaty. The Treaty of Brest-Litovsk was signed in March 1918 between Soviet Russia and the Central Powers, primarily Germany. It ended Russia's involvement in World War I and resulted in territorial losses for Russia.
Option A suggests that although Russia gave up a lot of land, the Russian people were relieved to exit the war. While it is true that Russia was facing internal conflicts and widespread discontent during this time, this option does not explicitly discuss the consequences or impact of the treaty.
Option B states that the treaty negotiation showed how powerful the new Bolshevik government was. This option is partially correct as the Bolshevik government, led by Vladimir Lenin, successfully negotiated the treaty. However, it does not fully capture the overall impact of the treaty or its consequences on Russia as a nation.
Option C suggests that the land Germany took from Russia cost the country resources and led to a new war. This option is not accurate as the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk did result in territorial losses for Russia, but it did not directly lead to a new war. It is important to note that the Russian Civil War, which began shortly after the treaty, was primarily a result of internal divisions rather than the consequences of Brest-Litovsk.
Option D claims that the treaty did not affect the nation since it was undone after World War I ended. This option is incorrect as the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk had significant implications for Russia. While some territorial losses were indeed reversed after World War I, the immediate impact of the treaty involved substantial territorial concessions and economic repercussions for Russia.
Considering the options provided, the best explanation of the impact of the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk on Russia is option C: The land Germany took from Russia cost the country resources and led to a new war. However, it is essential to note that the new war mentioned in option C refers to the Russian Civil War, which was primarily driven by internal conflicts within Russia and not a direct consequence of the territorial losses from the treaty.