Which of the following statements is NOT true of physical symbol system hypothesis? (Select the one that is false.)

Group of answer choices

The system symbols are physical patterns

Symbols can be combined to form complex symbol structures

The physical symbol system is not required for intelligence

The system contains processes for manipulating symbol structures

The physical symbol system is not required for intelligence

The statement "The physical symbol system is not required for intelligence" is NOT true of the physical symbol system hypothesis.

To determine which statement is NOT true of the physical symbol system hypothesis, we will break down each statement and analyze its accuracy.

1. The system symbols are physical patterns: This statement is true. According to the physical symbol system hypothesis, the symbols used in the system must have a physical representation. For example, in a computer system, the symbols could be represented by bits or electrical patterns.

2. Symbols can be combined to form complex symbol structures: This statement is true. According to the physical symbol system hypothesis, symbols can be combined and organized in various ways to create complex structures. For instance, in a programming language, multiple symbols can be combined to form loops, functions, or objects.

3. The physical symbol system is not required for intelligence: This statement is false. The physical symbol system hypothesis suggests that a system capable of manipulating symbols is a necessary requirement for intelligence. It proposes that intelligence can be simulated by a physical symbol system that can manipulate and interpret symbolic representations.

4. The system contains processes for manipulating symbol structures: This statement is true. The physical symbol system hypothesis emphasizes that intelligent behavior arises from the manipulations and transformations of symbol structures within the system. These processes may include operations such as pattern matching, logical inference, and relational manipulation.

From the above analysis, we can conclude that the statement "The physical symbol system is not required for intelligence" is NOT true of the physical symbol system hypothesis. This option represents the false statement among the given choices.