Why did the Dred Scott v. Sandford decision anger Northerners?
(1 point)
Responses
It made slavery legal in the territories.
It made slavery legal in the territories.
It sought to continue the series of compromises on slavery.
It sought to continue the series of compromises on slavery.
It allowed for expansion of slavery into the North.
It allowed for expansion of slavery into the North.
It created popular sovereignty as the rule for all territories.
The correct response is:
- It allowed for expansion of slavery into the North.
It made slavery legal in the territories
What is the connection among sectionalism, slavery, and states’ rights as causes of the Civil War? How did the Southern response to the 1860 election results demonstrate this connection?
(4 points)
formal tone
Make it sound like a 6th grader
The correct answer is: It made slavery legal in the territories.
To understand why the Dred Scott v. Sandford decision angered Northerners, we need to understand the context and the ruling of the case. Dred Scott was a slave who had been taken by his owner to live in a free state and a free territory, where slavery was prohibited. After his owner's death, Scott argued that since he had lived in these free territories, he should be considered a free man.
However, the Supreme Court, in its ruling in 1857, made several significant decisions. Firstly, it declared that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, were not citizens and therefore could not sue in federal court. Secondly, it determined that the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had banned slavery in certain territories, was unconstitutional.
This decision had a profound impact on Northerners because it essentially legalized slavery in all territories, regardless of whether they were designated as free or slave states. It meant that slave owners could bring their slaves into any territory, including those where slavery had been previously prohibited. This decision was seen as a victory for the South and a blow to the anti-slavery movement in the North.
Therefore, the Dred Scott v. Sandford decision angered Northerners because it expanded the reach of slavery, allowed its potential expansion into the North, and undermined the efforts to limit and eventually abolish slavery in the United States.