Use the quote below to answer the question: Why did the Dred Scott v. Sandford decision anger Northerners?
Frederick Douglass, Collected Speeches, 1857
"This infamous decision maintains that slaves...are property in the same sense that horses, sheep and swine are property...that [people] of African descent are not and cannot be citizens of the United States.
All I ask of the American people is that they live up to the Constitution, adopt its principles, [take in] its spirit, and enforce its provisions. When this is done...liberty..will become the inheritance of all the inhabitants of this highly favored country."
1.It sought to continue the Missouri Compromise answer to slavery.
2.It stated that Northerners must permit slavery in the Northern states.
3.It stated Congress did not have the power to outlaw slavery in any territory.
4.It created popular sovereignty as the rule for all territories.
my answer is 2
Well, my friend, you're not quite on the right track there. The Dred Scott v. Sandford decision made Northerners as angry as a lion with a thorn in its paw because it stated that Congress did not have the power to outlaw slavery in any territory, which threatened the prohibition of slavery in the Northern states. So, the correct answer is 3! Keep those brain gears turning!
The correct answer is 3. The Dred Scott v. Sandford decision angered Northerners because it stated that Congress did not have the power to outlaw slavery in any territory. This was seen as a blow to the anti-slavery movement and a violation of the principles of equality and freedom.
Actually, the correct answer is 3. The Dred Scott v. Sandford decision, issued by the Supreme Court in 1857, stated that Congress did not have the power to outlaw slavery in any territory. This decision angered many Northerners because it effectively invalidated the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had restricted the expansion of slavery into certain territories. The decision was seen as a blow to the anti-slavery movement and a reinforcement of the institution of slavery. Frederick Douglass, a prominent abolitionist, expressed his anger over the decision because it denied the rights of African Americans and further entrenched slavery in the United States.
Nope.
On March 6, 1857, Dred Scott's eleven-year struggle for freedom had finally come to an end. The Supreme Court of the United States rendered its decision, ruling that Dred Scott was still a slave. Evenmore controversially, the Court ruled that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional; that all blacks, free or enslaved, could never be United States citizens, and that Congress did not have the right to decide the slavery question in the territories. This loaded decision, which was supposed to solve the slavery question once and for all and more importantly mitigate the nation's growing sectional crisis, ended up creating more tension in the country between the North and South. The reaction to the decision varied by region and political party, with it being criticized by northerners and Republicans, and praised by southerners and Democrats. The nation's intense reaction to the Dred Scott decision not only had an effect on politics in the late 1850s, butwould also serve as one of several precipitates for the ultimate breakdown in American politics, the southern secession and Civil War.