What is the benefit of using both primary and secondary source material when studying historical events?(1 point)
Responses
They give a more complete understanding of the past.
They give a more complete understanding of the past.
They give only one point of view of an event.
They give only one point of view of an event.
They both give firsthand accounts.
They both give firsthand accounts.
All of the information is persuasive in nature.
All of the information is persuasive in nature.
bot
BOT I NEED HELP
They provide multiple perspectives and interpretations of the event.
Which main events are most likely included in the era named Age of Contact (1519–1689)?(1 point)
Responses
growth of the oil industry
growth of the oil industry
violent encounters between Native Americans and Spanish explorers
violent encounters between Native Americans and Spanish explorers
an expansion of cattle and railroads
an expansion of cattle and railroads
a civil war and the aftermath
violent encounters between Native Americans and Spanish explorers
The benefit of using both primary and secondary source material when studying historical events is that they give a more complete understanding of the past. By utilizing both types of sources, researchers are able to access firsthand accounts (primary sources) as well as analysis and interpretations of those accounts (secondary sources). This allows for a more well-rounded examination of the historical event, providing multiple perspectives and helping to establish a more accurate and comprehensive understanding. Additionally, using both primary and secondary sources helps to avoid relying solely on one point of view, as secondary sources can offer differing interpretations and analyses. It is worth noting that while primary sources are firsthand accounts, not all secondary sources provide only one point of view, as they can incorporate multiple perspectives and opinions.
The correct answer is:
They give a more complete understanding of the past.
When studying historical events, using both primary and secondary sources is beneficial because it provides a more comprehensive understanding of the past.
Primary sources are firsthand accounts or original documents created during the time period being studied. These can include letters, diaries, newspapers, photographs, official records, and artifacts. By examining primary sources, historians can directly access the perspectives, experiences, and voices of individuals who lived during that time. This helps to provide a more authentic and immediate understanding of historical events.
On the other hand, secondary sources are interpretations, analyses, or evaluations of primary sources created by scholars, historians, or experts. These can include textbooks, scholarly articles, biographies, documentaries, or textbooks. Secondary sources provide context, analysis, and different viewpoints on historical events. They often involve synthesis and interpretation of various primary sources, helping to provide a broader understanding and different perspectives.
By using both primary and secondary sources, historians can cross-reference information, validate sources, and gain multiple viewpoints on the same event. This not only enhances the accuracy and reliability of the information but also helps to identify biases, omissions, or conflicting accounts. It allows for a more nuanced and balanced understanding of history, taking into consideration different perspectives and multiple sources of evidence.
In conclusion, using both primary and secondary source material when studying historical events offers a more complete understanding of the past by combining firsthand accounts and interpretations from different sources.