What is the benefit of using both primary and secondary source material when studying historical events?(1 point) Responses They give only one point of view of an event. They give only one point of view of an event. They give a more complete understanding of the past. They give a more complete understanding of the past. All of the information is persuasive in nature. All of the information is persuasive in nature. They both give firsthand accounts.
The correct answer is: They give a more complete understanding of the past.
The main events most likely included in the era named Age of Contact (1519–1689) are violent encounters between Native Americans and Spanish explorers.
The purpose of the meeting that occurred at Washington-on-the-Brazos in 1836 was to establish Texas as an independent republic.
Texas manufacturers typically send products to destinations around the world by shipping them from ports in the Coastal Plains region.
Austin is considered to be the most liberal area of Texas.
Apache and Comanche camped near canyons and mountains to provide protection from attacks.
The aeronautics industry resulted in a growth of military fields and commercial airports across Texas.
The modification to the environment resulting from Hamill's description is the extraction of large quantities of oil from the Spindletop oil field in Beaumont.
what-
The benefit of using both primary and secondary source material when studying historical events is that they give a more complete understanding of the past. They provide different perspectives, allowing researchers to form a more well-rounded and nuanced interpretation of historical events. Additionally, primary sources offer firsthand accounts that provide direct insight into the time period being studied.
