Which of the following demonstrates how biased views on race, and relying too much on the writings of the wealthy elite, led early twentieth-century textbooks to publish mistakes about American history in the Civil War era?(1 point)
Responses
that the Comanche allied with the Confederacy
that the Comanche allied with the Confederacy
that some Texans did not support secession
that some Texans did not support secession
that enslaved people were happy under slavery
that enslaved people were happy under slavery
that slavery was a brutal institution that people often risked their lives to escape
That enslaved people were happy under slavery
Which set of events in the 1950s and 1960s best explains why historians began to look beyond the history of the elite and ask questions about historical inequality?
Responses
the Cold War
the Cold War - incorrect
the Vietnam War
the Vietnam War - no response given
the presidency of Dwight Eisenhower
the presidency of Dwight Eisenhower - no response given
the civil rights movement
The option that demonstrates how biased views on race, and relying too much on the writings of the wealthy elite, led to mistakes about American history in the Civil War era is:
- that enslaved people were happy under slavery.
The correct answer is: that enslaved people were happy under slavery.
To explain how biased views on race and relying too much on the writings of the wealthy elite led to this mistake in early twentieth-century textbooks, we need to understand the historical context of that time.
During the early twentieth century, America was still grappling with racial inequality and segregation. Many textbooks were written by historians who had biases and prejudices that influenced the way they presented history. These biases often leaned towards supporting the narratives of the wealthy elite, who were mainly white, while marginalizing other voices, especially those of marginalized communities, like enslaved people.
The mistake that enslaved people were happy under slavery reflects this biased view on race. It portrays a favorable image of slavery that was not accurate or supported by historical evidence. By relying on the writings of the wealthy elite, who had a vested interest in maintaining the status quo and defending their economic interests, these textbooks perpetuated a distorted version of history.
To avoid such biases and inaccuracies, it is crucial to critically analyze the sources and perspectives of historical information. When studying historical events, it is important to consult a wide range of primary and secondary sources, consider multiple perspectives, and question the motivations and biases of the authors or historians. This approach helps ensure a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of history.