Which of the following offers the best comparison between Hobbes’s and Locke’s perspectives on the divine right of kings?(1 point)
Responses
Both saw the divine right of kings as unnatural and bad.
Both saw the divine right of kings as unnatural and bad.
Hobbes supported the divine right of kings as absolute monarchs.
Hobbes supported the divine right of kings as absolute monarchs.
As Christians, both accepted the divine right of kings.
As Christians, both accepted the divine right of kings.
Locke supported the divine right of kings because it gave people more freedom.
Hobbes supported the idea of absolute monarchy, while Locke believed in limited government and the consent of the governed.
The best comparison between Hobbes’s and Locke’s perspectives on the divine right of kings is:
Hobbes supported the divine right of kings as absolute monarchs.
Locke did not support the divine right of kings because it gave people more freedom.
So, the correct option would be:
Locke supported the divine right of kings because it gave people more freedom.