Can you make this sound like implication not conclusion
The legal issues of ACCC holds power to address scams not effectively protecting consumers have been evaluated form two differing viewpoints: ACCC and consumers. Changing the legislation to provide further government funding has been recommended as an addendum to current legislation of Australian Consumer Law (2011) to rectify application of act in legal system. Therefore, change in legislation must needed for right future direction.
Based on the evaluation of the legal issues surrounding the ACCC's power to address scams and effectively protect consumers, it can be inferred that a change in legislation is necessary for the right future direction. One viewpoint is held by the ACCC, while the other is from the perspective of consumers. As a possible solution, the recommendation is to amend the current Australian Consumer Law (2011) by providing additional government funding, in order to address the shortcomings in the application of the act within the legal system.
To rephrase the provided statement to sound like an implication rather than a conclusion, we can modify the wording as follows:
Considering the evaluation of the legal issues of ACCC's power to address scams and effectively protect consumers from two differing viewpoints (ACCC and consumers), it is suggested that a change in legislation, specifically in the form of additional government funding, be made as an addendum to the current Australian Consumer Law (2011) to rectify the application of the act in the legal system. This implies that for the right future direction, a change in legislation is necessary.