Use what you learned about accessing and evaluating information to conduct
online research. Find at least three primary and secondary sources to evaluate
Federalist, no. 51 and Marbury v. Madison. Create a table that evaluates the
strengths and weaknesses of and reasons for checks and balances and
separation of powers.
Primary Sources:
1. Federalist, No. 51 by James Madison:
- Strengths: Written by one of the main authors of the Constitution, provides insight into the rationale behind the separation of powers and checks and balances
- Weaknesses: Biased towards supporting the Constitution and may not provide a comprehensive analysis of opposing viewpoints
2. Marbury v. Madison Supreme Court Decision (1803):
- Strengths: Provides the official legal interpretation of the Constitution's separation of powers and checks and balances, crucial in establishing the principle of judicial review
- Weaknesses: Legal language may be complex and require a background in law to fully understand, limited to the specific case being decided
Secondary Sources:
1. "Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances" by the Congressional Research Service:
- Strengths: Analyses the historical development of the separation of powers and checks and balances, provides a comprehensive overview of the strengths and weaknesses of this system
- Weaknesses: May be overly technical or detailed for readers without a legal or governmental background
2. "The Importance of Checks and Balances in Government" by the National Constitution Center:
- Strengths: Offers a clear and concise explanation of the importance of checks and balances and separation of powers in maintaining a functioning government, suitable for general readership
- Weaknesses: May have a slight bias towards promoting the importance of checks and balances without addressing potential weaknesses or criticisms
3. "The Federalist Papers and the Separation of Powers" by Gordon Lloyd:
- Strengths: Provides an in-depth analysis of the Federalist Papers, including Federalist, No. 51, and their influence on the creation of the separation of powers and checks and balances in the Constitution
- Weaknesses: May contain a more scholarly approach, potentially making it less accessible to general readers
Table:
=======================================================================
| Sources | Strengths | Weaknesses |
=======================================================================
| Federalist, No. 51 | - Insight from Constitution's author | - Biased towards supporting the Constitution |
| | - May not provide comprehensive analysis |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Marbury v. Madison | - Official legal interpretation | - Complex legal language |
| Supreme Court Decision | - Establishes judicial review | - Limited to specific case |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
| "Separation of Powers and | - Historical development | - May be overly technical or detailed |
| Checks and Balances" | - Comprehensive overview | for non-legal/governmental readers |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
| "The Importance of Checks | - Clear and concise explanation | - Potential bias without addressing |
| and Balances in Government" | - Suitable for general readership | weaknesses or criticisms |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
| "The Federalist Papers | - In-depth analysis of influence | - Potentially less accessible for general |
| and the Separation of Powers" | of the Federalist Papers | readers |
=======================================================================
To conduct online research, you can follow these steps:
Step 1: Identify your research objectives. In this case, you are looking for three primary and secondary sources on Federalist, No. 51 and Marbury v. Madison.
Step 2: Use reliable search engines and databases. Perform searches using keywords like "Federalist, No. 51 primary source," "Federalist, No. 51 secondary source," "Marbury v. Madison primary source," and "Marbury v. Madison secondary source."
Step 3: Evaluate the sources based on their credibility, relevance, and quality. Look for sources from reputable institutions, authors, and publications.
Step 4: Once you have found three sources, create a table to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of checks and balances and separation of powers:
| | Checks and Balances | Separation of Powers |
|----------------------|---------------------|----------------------|
| Strengths | - Prevents abuse of power<br>- Promotes accountability<br>- Ensures one branch doesn't become too powerful | - Prevents concentration of power<br>- Provides system of checks<br>- Allows for specialization in each branch |
| Weaknesses | - Can lead to gridlock and inefficiency<br>- Can slow down decision-making process | - Can lead to conflicts and lack of coordination<br>- Difficult to maintain balance consistently |
| Reasons | - Protects individual rights and liberties<br>- Prevents tyranny<br>- Promotes stability and order | - Prevents abuses and tyranny<br>- Promotes democratic governance<br>- Maintains the rule of law |
Step 5: Use the information from your sources and your own analysis to complete the table based on the strengths, weaknesses, and reasons for checks and balances and separation of powers.
Remember to properly cite your sources using the appropriate citation style (e.g., APA, MLA) when using information from the sources.