Evidence must be (interesting or relevant or opinionated) and (Entertaining or Inferred or sufficient) for it to be considered effective in supporting a claim.
False: Evidence must be relevant and sufficient to be considered effective in supporting a claim. It is not necessary for evidence to be entertaining or opinionated, although it can be helpful in some cases. Inferred evidence can also be effective, but it must be based on logical reasoning and not mere speculation.
so what are the answers I just had a stroke reading this
The statement "Evidence must be (interesting or relevant or opinionated) and (Entertaining or Inferred or sufficient) for it to be considered effective in supporting a claim" is false. Evidence must be relevant and sufficient to effectively support a claim. It is not necessary for the evidence to be entertaining or opinionated, although it can be helpful in some cases. Inferred evidence can also be effective, but it must be based on logical reasoning and not mere speculation.
Evidence must be relevant and sufficient for it to be considered effective in supporting a claim.
