Compare and contrast the following 2 essays:
1. Have you ever seen a sea turtle, whale, shark, or dolphin? Even if you have only seen pictures online, you can see how cute all of these creatures are. Well, they are in danger. So many of them are killed every year because of plastic waste. From people throwing away single-use water bottles to companies using a ton of plastic to make their products, we can all do better. Scientists are finding creatures like fish and sea birds with their stomachs filled with indigestible plastic. We have to change this, starting today!
2. Oceans cover 71 percent of Earth’s surface, and they are where most of Earth’s water comes from. Because of this, they are one of our greatest natural resources. Unfortunately, around 8 million metric tons of plastic enters our oceans each year. We all need to do more to save our oceans from this type of pollution. Fortunately, there are groups like the Ocean Conservancy, Oceana, and the Lonely Whale Foundation. They are all dedicated to helping this issue.
The first essay focuses on the impact of plastic waste on sea creatures, while the second essay highlights the importance of oceans as a natural resource and the organizations dedicated to preserving them. While they have different themes, both essays call for action to protect our oceans.
The first essay takes a personal approach, asking the reader if they have seen these adorable sea creatures and then presenting the sobering problem of plastic pollution. It emphasizes the responsibility we all have in reducing plastic waste and how we can make a difference.
On the other hand, the second essay takes a more informative approach, presenting facts and statistics about the amount of plastic entering our oceans and the organizations that are working to combat it. It highlights the seriousness of the issue and the need for collective action to protect these valuable natural resources.
Overall, both essays effectively communicate the urgency of protecting our oceans from plastic pollution and the need for action. The first essay uses a more emotional appeal, while the second essay presents a more factual argument.
paraphrase the answer
I will restate the response in different words:
Both essays have different themes, with the first one discussing the impact of plastic on sea creatures and the second highlighting the importance of oceans as a natural resource and organizations working to preserve them. However, both essays call for action to protect our oceans. The first essay takes a personal tone and asks the reader if they have seen sea animals, before explaining the problem of plastic pollution and the steps that can be taken to address it. Alternatively, the second essay takes an informative approach by presenting facts and figures on the amount of plastic waste entering oceans and the organizations that are working to combat it. Both essays make a strong case for taking action to protect our oceans from plastic pollution, with the first using emotion to appeal to readers while the second relies on factual information.
Essay 1 focuses on the immediate impact of plastic waste on marine creatures such as sea turtles, whales, sharks, and dolphins. The writer emphasizes the cuteness of these animals, which grabs the attention and evokes an emotional response from the readers. The essay highlights the urgent need for change in our behavior regarding plastic waste and the potential harm it causes to marine life. It calls for action right now to address this problem.
Essay 2 takes a broader perspective on the importance of oceans as a natural resource. It emphasizes the significance of oceans in the Earth's ecosystem by covering a large portion of the planet's surface and providing a major source of water. The essay then addresses the issue of plastic pollution and the substantial amount that enters the oceans annually. It mentions specific organizations dedicated to addressing this problem, suggesting that collective efforts are required to tackle it effectively.
To compare and contrast the two essays:
1. Focus: Essay 1 concentrates on the immediate impact of plastic waste on marine creatures, while Essay 2 takes a broader perspective on the importance of oceans as a natural resource.
2. Tone and Emotion: Essay 1 evokes emotion by emphasizing the cuteness of marine creatures, aiming to create a sense of urgency and encourage immediate action. Essay 2 maintains a more objective tone, providing facts and mentioning organizations dedicated to addressing the issue.
3. Scope: Essay 1 focuses primarily on the issue of plastic waste and its impact on marine life, whereas Essay 2 discusses the larger context of oceans as a valuable resource and introduces organizations working towards its preservation.
4. Call to Action: Essay 1 directly urges readers to "change this, starting today," emphasizing individual responsibility. Essay 2 suggests that collective efforts are needed and highlights organizations dedicated to this cause.
By comparing and contrasting these two essays, we can see that both highlight the issue of plastic pollution in the oceans and the need for action. However, Essay 1 takes a more focused and emotional approach, while Essay 2 presents a broader perspective on the importance of oceans as a natural resource and suggests collaborative solutions.