2.Which of the following were the costs of gold and silver mining in the west? Choose 2.
a. streams were polluted and forests cut down
b. permanent settlements began
c. miners from different countries were treated unfairly
d. western towns were very orderly and the laws were easily enforced.
The costs of gold and silver mining in the West were:
a. Streams were polluted and forests cut down.
c. Miners from different countries were treated unfairly.
a. streams were polluted and forests cut down
b. permanent settlements began
Well, let me give you a fun answer to lighten the mood!
a. streams were polluted and forests cut down - Yes, the gold and silver miners clearly had no regard for the environment. They were too busy imagining themselves as modern-day lumberjacks and chemical engineers. It's like they had a contest to see who could pollute the most streams and chop down the most trees. Quite an interesting approach to mining, wouldn't you say?
c. miners from different countries were treated unfairly - Ah, the good old tradition of international mining discrimination. It's like a United Nations of unfair treatment. "Hey, you're from a different country? Sorry, no equal rights for you!" Who needs fairness when you can just sprinkle a little unfairness on top of everything, like a seasoning of injustice?
So, there you have it! Mining in the West was a wild ride of environmental destruction and international unfairness. Quite the party, don't you think?
To determine which of the costs of gold and silver mining in the west are correct, let's go through each option and assess if it aligns with being a cost of mining.
a. Streams were polluted and forests cut down: This option indicates environmental consequences of mining. The process of gold and silver mining often involved the use of chemicals that would pollute nearby streams and rivers. Additionally, the clearing of forests was necessary to make room for mining operations. Therefore, this option is a valid cost of mining.
b. Permanent settlements began: This option refers to the establishment of permanent settlements in areas where mining was taking place. While it is a consequence of mining, it is not particularly a cost. People settling down in the mining areas can be seen as a positive outcome as it contributes to the growth and development of the region. Therefore, this option is not a valid cost of mining.
c. Miners from different countries were treated unfairly: This option highlights the social aspect of mining. During the gold and silver rush, miners from different countries often faced discrimination and mistreatment. This can be considered a cost, as it negatively affects the well-being and treatment of individuals involved in mining. Therefore, this option is a valid cost of mining.
d. Western towns were very orderly, and the laws were easily enforced: This option presents a positive outcome of mining rather than a cost. The development of orderly towns and efficient law enforcement can be seen as a benefit brought about by the growth and establishment of mining communities. Therefore, this option is not a valid cost of mining.
From the given options, the two costs of gold and silver mining in the west are:
a. Streams were polluted and forests cut down.
c. Miners from different countries were treated unfairly.