How did the case of Miranda v. Arizona change the way that the police interact with the people they arrest?
a. Criminal suspects are encouraged to video their interactions with police for later evidence during a trial.
b. Police are prevented from using excessive force to subdue violent offenders who pose a risk to other people.
c. Police officers have to inform criminal suspects of their rights to silence and an attorney before they are questioned.
d. Suspected criminals are required to show proof of identification and citizenship before being arrested.
c. Police officers have to inform criminal suspects of their rights to silence and an attorney before they are questioned.
The case of Miranda v. Arizona established the requirement that law enforcement officers inform individuals of their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, as well as their Sixth Amendment right to an attorney before questioning. This decision made it illegal for law enforcement officers to interrogate individuals without informing them of these rights, and it has become a standard practice in the American criminal justice system for law enforcement officials to recite the Miranda warning to individuals when they are taken into custody. Therefore, answer option (c) is correct. Answer options (a), (b), and (d) are incorrect, as they do not reflect the impact of the Miranda v. Arizona case on policing.