define judicial activism and judicial restraint. explain the reasons that judges would exercise activism or restraint, and tell how Plessy v Ferguson and Brown v Board of Education were examples of each.
2. B
3. B
4. A
5. D
6. C
7. Warning: DONT COPY AND PASTE, CHANGE BEFORE SUBMITING!!
Through judicial activism, it is possible to ensure that the rights of individuals are given priority and their needs are provided for. A judge or a court of law is considered to be restrained when it is unwilling to depart from past cases laid down by the law. As a judge, you would exercise activism so that your rights as a citizen would be protected. Plessy v Ferguson and Brown v Board of Education were examples of activism and restraint. In Plessy v Ferguson and Brown v Board of Education, people were denied their rights unfairly because their racial background caused them to be discriminated against.
Good luck!
- Amy ^v^
Through judicial activism, it is possible to ensure that the rights of individuals are given priority and their needs are provided for. A judge or a court of law is considered to be restrained when it is unwilling to depart from past cases laid down by the law. As a judge, you would exercise activism so that your rights as a citizen would be protected. Plessy v Ferguson and Brown v Board of Education were examples of activism and restraint. In Plessy v Ferguson and Brown v Board of Education, people were denied their rights unfairly because their racial background caused them to be discriminated against.
