Investigating gravity quick check use the table of data from an investigation to answer the question mass of ball grams you have 10 15 26 time to hit gram 1.021.01.62 a student is investigating gravity and falling objects she drops 3 balls in terms how long it takes each bar to hit the ground what is the most likely source of era

The most likely source of error in this investigation could be the inconsistency in the mass of the balls. The mass of the balls used in the investigation should ideally be the same for accurate results. However, in the given data, the masses of the balls are different (10g, 15g, 26g). This inconsistency in mass can affect the timing of the balls hitting the ground, leading to potential errors in the results. Therefore, the varying mass of the balls is the most likely source of error in this investigation.

To analyze the data and determine the most likely source of error in the investigation of gravity and falling objects, we need to examine the table provided.

Firstly, let's observe the mass of the balls in grams: 10, 15, and 26. The mass of an object should not significantly affect the rate at which it falls due to gravity. Therefore, the mass of the balls is unlikely to be the source of error in this investigation.

Next, we have the time it takes for each ball to hit the ground, given in seconds: 1.02, 1.01, and 1.62. These times indicate the falling speed of each ball. In the case of free fall, without any air resistance, objects should fall at the same rate, regardless of their mass. However, we can see that the third ball took significantly longer to hit the ground compared to the other two.

Based on this information, the most likely source of error in this investigation is air resistance. Air resistance can have an impact on the falling speed of objects, especially if they have a larger surface area or irregular shape. In this case, the third ball with a mass of 26 grams might have experienced greater air resistance, causing it to take longer to reach the ground compared to the other two balls.

To further investigate and confirm this hypothesis, additional trials could be conducted using different ball shapes or sizes to observe any variations in falling times. Taking measurements in controlled environments or using equipment specifically designed to minimize air resistance could also help reduce the impact of this error source.

The most likely source of error in this investigation is human error. The student may not have dropped the balls at the same height or with the same force each time, which could affect the results.