1. Which of the following describes the principle of checks and balances? (I point
O Congress must make sure that the national budget is balanced.
O One branch of government can check the power of another branch of government.
O Power is balanced equally between the federal government and the states.
States can check all laws passed by the federal government.
2. Which of the following is the best example of the principle of checks and balances? (1 point
O Congress passes a new law on immigration.
O Courts uphold the conviction of a person who failed to pay income tax.
O Courts release a person charged with violating a law that is considered unconstitutional.
O The president negotiates a treaty with Spain.
3. Which of these is a true statement about the limits placed on Congress? Select all that apply. (2 points)
O The Bill of Rights gives Congress power to tax citizens.
Federalism places limits on Congress by reserving certain powers to the courts.
The Constitution limits Congress from passing certain kinds of laws.
Separation of powers divides the national government into different branches.
O Congress cannot override a veto by the president.
Ok so i just found someone else who answered this for me on a different question and if anyone else needs the answers for this the answers are:
1. B
2. C
3. C,D
hope this helps anyone who needs the help!
Could someone please help me out, i really need a 100 in this class at the moment. Please.
1. The correct answer that describes the principle of checks and balances is: One branch of government can check the power of another branch of government. To arrive at this answer, we can refer to the concept of checks and balances in the U.S. government system. This principle ensures that no branch of government becomes too powerful and that each branch has the ability to limit or restrain the actions of the other branches. It promotes the idea of separation of powers and prevents one branch from dominating the others. It allows for a system of accountability and prevents any branch from abusing its power.
2. The best example of the principle of checks and balances is: Courts release a person charged with violating a law that is considered unconstitutional. This example demonstrates the role of the judiciary in checking the power of the legislative branch. When a court determines that a law is unconstitutional, it can overturn it and release individuals charged with violating that law. This action ensures that laws passed by Congress are within the boundaries set by the Constitution.
3. The true statements about the limits placed on Congress are: The Constitution limits Congress from passing certain kinds of laws, and Separation of powers divides the national government into different branches. To answer this question, we need to understand the sources and nature of the limits placed on Congress. The Constitution grants specific powers to Congress, but it also establishes certain restrictions to prevent the abuse of power. These limitations include prohibitions on passing ex post facto laws, bills of attainder, and laws infringing on certain constitutional rights. Additionally, the principle of separation of powers ensures that no single branch of government becomes too powerful by dividing power among the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. This division of power serves as a check on Congress and prevents it from operating without any restraints.
1. The principle of checks and balances is best described as one branch of government being able to check the power of another branch of government.
2. The best example of the principle of checks and balances is when courts release a person charged with violating a law that is considered unconstitutional.
3. The true statements about the limits placed on Congress are:
- The Constitution limits Congress from passing certain kinds of laws.
- Separation of powers divides the national government into different branches.