Which of the following statements about analyzing a literary text is true?
Responses
Readers can only use explicit details from the text to support their analysis of a text.
There must be text evidence from two different literary texts in order for the analysis to be complete.
Text evidence does not provide support or merit to an analysis of a literary text.
False. Text evidence provides support and merit to an analysis of a literary text.
so its c?
The statement that is true about analyzing a literary text is:
Readers can only use explicit details from the text to support their analysis of a text.
Analyzing a literary text requires using evidence and details from the text itself to support the analysis. These explicit details provide the necessary support and merit to the analysis, allowing readers to delve into the deeper meaning and interpretation of the text.
The statement that is true about analyzing a literary text is: Readers can only use explicit details from the text to support their analysis of a text.
When analyzing a literary text, it is important to focus on evidence from the text itself. This means looking for specific details, such as quotes, descriptions, and actions of the characters, to support your analysis. By using explicit details from the text, readers can provide a strong and valid analysis of the literary text.
The second statement, "There must be text evidence from two different literary texts in order for the analysis to be complete," is not necessarily true. While comparing and contrasting different texts can enhance an analysis, it is not a requirement for completing an analysis. It is possible to thoroughly analyze a single literary text by examining the various elements within it.
The third statement, "Text evidence does not provide support or merit to an analysis of a literary text," is not true at all. Text evidence is crucial for supporting and substantiating an analysis of a literary text. It is the concrete evidence that readers use to back up their interpretations and arguments. Without text evidence, an analysis would lack credibility and would be based solely on personal opinion rather than on the text itself.