Which Hindu practices conflicted with the beliefs of eighth century, Muslim conquerors select all that apply.
To determine which Hindu practices conflicted with the beliefs of eighth-century Muslim conquerors, we can study the historical context and religious differences between Hinduism and Islam during that time period. Here are some practices that were likely seen as conflicting by Muslim conquerors:
1. Polytheism: Hinduism is a polytheistic religion, meaning it worships multiple deities. In contrast, Islam strictly follows monotheism, worshiping only one God (Allah). Muslim conquerors may have considered the Hindu practice of polytheism as contradictory to their monotheistic beliefs.
2. Idol Worship: Hinduism involves the veneration of idols and sacred images, believing them to be representations of deities. Islam, however, strictly prohibits idol worship, considering it as a form of idolatry or Shirk. The Muslim conquerors may have objected to this practice.
3. Caste System: Hinduism has a hierarchical caste system, dividing society into different social classes based on birth and occupation. Islam, on the other hand, rejects any form of social hierarchy or discrimination based on birth or caste. The Muslim conquerors may have found this caste system conflicting with their belief in equality before God.
4. Sati: Sati was a controversial ancient Hindu practice, in which a widow would self-immolate on her husband's funeral pyre. Although the practice was discouraged by many Hindu reform movements, it still persisted in some regions. Muslim conquerors may have viewed this practice as oppressive and against their beliefs in the sanctity of life.
It's important to note that these are general observations that were typical during that time. There were instances of mutual respect and accommodation between Hindus and Muslims as well. The level of conflict and resistance to Hindu practices varied across different rulers and regions.