Which piece of evidence could be added to strengthen the idea that people should become vegetarian to save the planet? (1 point)
Not all scientific experts believe that changes need to be made to lessen human impact on the planet.
There are economic benefits to avoiding devastating extreme weather events that could result from climate change.
A vegan or vegetarian diet could cut greenhouse gas emissions by 70% and 63%, respectively.
The benefits of the vegetarian diet could play a role in the policies that a government develops.
I THINK IT'S C HELP PLSPLSPLS
Analyzing Informational Text Unit Test
1: Sequence
2: People need to know how to check for valid information to prevent the spread of fake news.
3: Students can earn poor grades because they have not completed assignments, not because they do not understand.
4: A vegan or vegetarian diet could cut greenhouse gas emissions by 70% and 63%, respectively.
5: reading other writers' interpretations
6: It is necessary to reach a healthy goal weight.
7: a critical reader
8: by including an example of a non-native animal that has caused problems in a new environment
9: compare the strengths and limitations of each medium
10: a video
the rest are essay questions that you can also look up <3
these are 100% for connexus so, I'm sorry if you are using another program!
I believe it sounds as if C is correct as well.
Yes, you are correct. Adding the evidence that a vegan or vegetarian diet could cut greenhouse gas emissions by 70% and 63% respectively would strengthen the idea that people should become vegetarian to save the planet. This evidence shows the environmental impact of dietary choices and emphasizes that adopting a vegetarian diet can significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions, which contributes to mitigating climate change.
To figure out which piece of evidence could strengthen the idea that people should become vegetarian to save the planet, let's consider each option:
A. "Not all scientific experts believe that changes need to be made to lessen human impact on the planet." This statement does not necessarily support the idea of becoming vegetarian to save the planet. It suggests a difference of opinion among experts, but it does not provide evidence directly related to vegetarianism's impact on the planet.
B. "There are economic benefits to avoiding devastating extreme weather events that could result from climate change." While this statement highlights the economic benefits of averting extreme weather events caused by climate change, it does not directly support the idea of becoming vegetarian.
C. "A vegan or vegetarian diet could cut greenhouse gas emissions by 70% and 63%, respectively." This evidence directly supports the idea that people should become vegetarian to save the planet. By reducing greenhouse gas emissions significantly, a vegan or vegetarian diet can help combat climate change and its environmental impacts.
D. "The benefits of the vegetarian diet could play a role in the policies that a government develops." This statement suggests that the benefits of a vegetarian diet could influence government policies, but it does not directly strengthen the idea that individuals should become vegetarian to save the planet.
Based on this analysis, option C is the correct answer, as it presents specific evidence supporting the idea of becoming vegetarian to save the planet. A vegan or vegetarian diet's substantial reduction in greenhouse gas emissions contributes to environmental sustainability.