What kinds of questions do they pose to one another, and how do they respond? How is the evidence each speaker uses relevant to the discussion?
When people engage in a conversation or debate, they pose different kinds of questions to one another. These questions can vary depending on the topic, context, and purpose of the discussion. Here are some common types of questions people pose to one another:
1. Clarification questions: These questions seek to obtain more information or a clearer understanding. For example, "Can you explain what you mean by 'X'?" or "Could you give me an example of what you're saying?"
2. Probing questions: These questions aim to dig deeper into someone's statement or argument. They encourage the speaker to provide more details, reasons, or evidence. For instance, "Why do you believe that?" or "What led you to that conclusion?"
3. Counter-questions: These questions challenge or counter an initial question or statement. They are used to raise an alternative perspective or point of view. For example, "Have you considered the implications of 'Y'?" or "What about the possible drawbacks?"
4. Hypothetical questions: These questions explore hypothetical scenarios or possibilities to test someone's position or argument. They often start with "What if" or "Suppose that." For instance, "What if we implemented this policy in a different way?" or "Suppose we had unlimited resources, how would that affect your proposal?"
When responding to questions, individuals typically provide evidence to support their answers or arguments. This evidence can take various forms, such as:
1. Factual evidence: Providing concrete, verifiable information, data, or statistics to support their point.
2. Logical reasoning: Presenting logical arguments, using deductive or inductive reasoning, to make a case for their position.
3. Personal experiences: Sharing personal anecdotes or experiences that are relevant to the topic at hand.
4. Expert opinions or quotations: Referring to established experts or reputable sources to back up their claims.
The relevance of the evidence is essential to the discussion as it adds credibility and weight to the participant's arguments. It helps to convince others of the validity of their viewpoint and fosters a well-informed and reasoned conversation.