Which statement best explains what would happen if a reactant were added to a system in equilibrium?(1 point)

The system would shift toward the reactants to oppose the change.

The system would shift toward the products to oppose the change.

The system would shift toward the reactants to enhance the change.

The system would shift toward the products to enhance the change

Just took the test here ya go

1. The system would shift toward the PRODUCTS to OPPOSE the change
2. Adding an ion that Causes SCN- to precipitate
3. DECREASING the pH will RELEASE Fe3+ ions and cause the solution to become more RED
4. MN042- ions
5. DECREASING the pH

I would kiss you if I saw you irl I don't care how sus it is

Real Answers is 100% right

Real Answers is correct thank you

dude thank u sm. 100% correct. this is helping me out a lot

You even capitalized the key words in the answers thank you

thus be booty

To determine the correct answer, we need to apply Le Chatelier's principle, which states that a system in equilibrium will shift in such a way as to oppose any changes made to it.

If a reactant is added to a system in equilibrium, the system will respond by shifting toward the products to oppose the change. Adding more reactant creates an imbalance, and the system will adjust by producing more products, ultimately reestablishing equilibrium.

Therefore, the correct answer is: The system would shift toward the products to oppose the change.

When a system in equilibrium is subjected to a stress the system will shift in such as way so as to relieve the stress. In simpler terms, Le Chatelier's Principle says that when we do something to a system in equilibrium it will try to undo what we did to it. So if we add a reactant the system will shift to the right which will produce more produces and use up some of what we added as a reactant.

I think it is C? Is this correct