What must be separated from supporting evidence and paraphrase or summarize?
Heya! I’ll be gladly to help c:
If that’s the only one i’ll give u that answer please do give me the other options. :)! Tysm! <3
To answer your question step-by-step:
1. Supporting Evidence: This refers to the facts, data, examples, or quotations that are used to support and strengthen your arguments or claims. They provide specific information to back up your ideas.
2. Paraphrase or Summarize: These are techniques used to restate someone else's ideas or points in your own words. Paraphrasing involves rewriting a passage using different words and sentence structures, while summarizing involves condensing the main points of a longer piece of text into a shorter version.
So, what must be separated from supporting evidence and paraphrase or summarize is the original source of the information. It is important to clearly indicate when you are using supporting evidence and when you are paraphrasing or summarizing someone else's work to avoid plagiarism and give credit to the original author.
To answer this question, we need to understand the differences between supporting evidence and paraphrase/summarize.
Supporting evidence refers to specific facts, examples, or details that are used to bolster or back up a claim or argument. It provides validity and credibility to the statements made by the author. Supporting evidence can take the form of direct quotations, statistics, research findings, or other types of sources.
On the other hand, paraphrasing or summarizing involves expressing someone else's ideas or information in your own words, while still maintaining the original meaning. Paraphrasing and summarizing are useful techniques when you want to condense information or avoid too much reliance on direct quotations.
Now, to answer your question, what needs to be separated from supporting evidence and paraphrase/summarize is your own analysis or evaluation. When presenting supporting evidence, it is important to maintain objectivity and present the information without expressing personal opinions or biases. Your own analysis or evaluation should be clearly separated from the supporting evidence and paraphrased/summarized information.
To achieve this separation, you can use signal phrases or introductory phrases to introduce the source of your evidence or paraphrase. For example, you can use phrases like "According to [Author's Name]..." or "Research conducted by [Organization] shows that..." before presenting the supporting evidence. This helps distinguish the source of the information from your own analysis or evaluation.
Furthermore, you can use your own words and writing style to present your own analysis or evaluation separately from the supporting evidence. This helps ensure that the reader can clearly differentiate between the information provided by others and your own analysis or thoughts.
In summary, the element that should be separated from supporting evidence and paraphrase/summarize is your own analysis or evaluation. This helps maintain clarity, objectivity, and allows the reader to clearly differentiate between the different components of your writing.