How should supporting evidence be presented in a conclusion?(1 point)
Responses
A Supporting evidence should be explained in full detail.
B Supporting evidence should be introduced.
C Supporting evidence should be supported with additional evidence.
D supporting evidence should be summarized.
D supporting evidence should be summarized.
which connections do you go to?
colombus ga
oh Wisconsin
The correct answer is B: Supporting evidence should be introduced.
When presenting supporting evidence in a conclusion, it is essential to introduce the evidence to provide context and clarity to the reader. This can be done by briefly summarizing the main points of the evidence or restating their significance in relation to the topic.
By introducing the supporting evidence, you allow the reader to understand the relevance and importance of the evidence in supporting your argument. This introduction also creates a smooth transition between the main body of the text and the conclusion, ensuring that the reader remains engaged and follows your line of reasoning.
While it is important to explain and support your evidence throughout your essay or research, the conclusion serves a different purpose. In the conclusion, you want to reinforce your argument and remind the reader of the key points that support your thesis. By introducing the supporting evidence in the conclusion, you effectively summarize its role and impact without going into extensive detail, as that is the purpose of the body paragraphs.
Therefore, option B, "Supporting evidence should be introduced," is the correct approach to presenting supporting evidence in a conclusion.