114.65
Minorities tend not to have much power or status and may even be dismissed as trouble makers, extremist or simply 'weirdos'. How, then, do they ever have any influence over the majority? The social psychologist Serge Moscovici claims that the answer lies in their behavioral style, i.e. the way _____________. The crucial factor in the success of the suffragette movement was that it's supporters were consistent in their views, and this created a considerable degree of social influence. Minorities that are active and organised, who support and defend their position consistently, can create social conflict, doubt and uncertainly among members of the majority, and ultimately this may lead to social change. Such change has often occurred because a minority has converted others to its point of view. Without the influence of minorities, we would have no innovation, no social change. Many of what now we regard as 'major' social movements (e.g. Christianity, trade unionism or feminism) were originally due to the influence of an outspoken minority.
1. minority cooperates with the majority
2. the minority brings about social change
3. the majority cultivates the minority
4. the minority tones down its voice
5. the minority gets its point across
This question is arduous and I would appreciate if I get a stable answer with elucidation.
wtf is this bro
lmao how do you even answer this
this is next level
i thinks its either 2 or 5.
i think its 5 as its about minorities connection with majority
The answer to the question lies in option 5, "the minority gets its point across." According to social psychologist Serge Moscovici, minorities can influence the majority by effectively communicating their ideas and consistently standing up for their beliefs.
To understand this concept more in-depth, let's break down the explanation:
In society, minorities often have limited power and status, making it challenging for them to influence the majority. They might be disregarded as troublemakers or dismissed due to being perceived as extremists or weirdos. However, Moscovici argues that it is their behavioral style - the way they communicate and express their ideas - that gives them influence.
Consistency plays a crucial role in the success of minority influence. When members of a minority group consistently uphold their views, it can create a sense of social influence. An example of this is the suffragette movement, where supporters consistently fought for women's suffrage. Their unwavering commitment to their cause generated social conflict, doubt, and uncertainty within the majority. Over time, this pressure and questioning led to social change, as some individuals from the majority were converted to the minority's viewpoint.
By consistently and persistently expressing their opinions, active and organized minorities can challenge the status quo and provoke the majority into reevaluating their beliefs and attitudes. This can ultimately lead to social change and innovations. Many major social movements like Christianity, trade unionism, or feminism originally began as the influence of outspoken minorities.
So, in summary, the answer to the question is that minorities can have influence over the majority by effectively getting their point across, being consistent in their views, and creating social conflict and doubt within the majority. This influence often leads to social change and innovation.