How does the author of selection 2 express his or her point of view differently than the other author?
A. The author of Selection 2 believes that the rising populations of humans and grizzlies are hurting one another.
B. The author of Selection 2 blames the rising numbers of the human population.
C. The author of Selection 2 denies that humans are endangering the grizzly bear population.
D. The author of Selection 2 thinks that the overpopulation of grizzlies is acceptable.
Please note: Type the question and answer to the response when you give answers. Everyone has a different test but might have SOME of the same questions and answers. I hope the answers given help others too.
And Parker Grant.
To understand how the author of Selection 2 expresses his or her point of view differently than the other author, we need to examine the options provided:
A. The author of Selection 2 believes that the rising populations of humans and grizzlies are hurting one another.
This option suggests that the author of Selection 2 sees a negative impact from both rising human and grizzly populations.
B. The author of Selection 2 blames the rising numbers of the human population.
This option implies that the author of Selection 2 places blame specifically on the increasing human population for any negative consequences.
C. The author of Selection 2 denies that humans are endangering the grizzly bear population.
This option suggests that the author of Selection 2 disagrees with the idea that humans are posing a threat to the grizzly bear population.
D. The author of Selection 2 thinks that the overpopulation of grizzlies is acceptable.
This option implies that the author of Selection 2 believes that the overpopulation of grizzlies is not a problem.
Based on the options provided, the author of Selection 2 expresses his or her point of view differently from the other author by choosing option B, blaming the rising numbers of the human population. It is important to note that without the text of Selection 2, it is difficult to fully assess the author's point of view. Reading the selection itself would provide more context and insight into the author's specific arguments and reasoning.