Some politicians claim to support the environment in speeches they make around the country. However, to get to those speeches they ride in gas guzzling, pollution creating private planes. They therefore clearly don’t believe a word of what they say and are actually making the environmental problem worse.

Question

Some politicians claim to support the environment in speeches they make around the country. However, to get to those speeches they ride in gas guzzling, pollution creating private planes. They therefore clearly don’t believe a word of what they say and are actually making the environmental problem worse.

Which one of the following, if true, would best weaken the argument above?

Answer 1

Any answer choices?

Answer 2

To weaken the argument that politicians who ride in gas-guzzling private planes while claiming to support the environment don't actually believe in what they say, we need to provide information that challenges the assumption that riding in private planes is contradictory to their environmental stance. Here are some possible options:

1. Many politicians who advocate for the environment offset their carbon footprint: This means they invest in projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions or absorb carbon dioxide equivalent to the emissions they generate through their private plane rides. By doing so, they mitigate the environmental impact of their travel.

2. Private planes are more fuel-efficient than commercial flights: While private planes may burn more fuel per passenger than commercial planes, they can often accommodate multiple passengers on a single trip. This means that, in some cases, private planes may actually be more fuel-efficient than if those politicians were to take separate flights on commercial airlines.

3. The politicians engage in other impactful environmental initiatives: Riding in private planes does not necessarily negate the politicians' overall commitment to the environment. They may contribute significantly in other ways, such as supporting renewable energy projects, advocating for environmental regulations, or promoting conservation efforts. Their actions in these domains should be considered alongside their mode of transportation.

By presenting any of these opposing arguments, we can weaken the conclusion that politicians who ride in private planes do not believe in what they say about supporting the environment.