how is Mercedes different from Hal and Charles in "The Call of The Wild"
Im really stuck but i think its A
Yeah what are the answers???
In order to compare how Mercedes is different from Hal and Charles in "The Call of The Wild," we need to understand the characters and their traits.
To begin, Mercedes is a character in Jack London's novel "The Call of The Wild," whereas Hal and Charles are brothers-in-law who are also characters in the same story.
Mercedes is portrayed as a wealthy and spoiled woman who accompanies her husband, Charles, on a journey to the Klondike during the gold rush. She is depicted as being ill-prepared for the harsh conditions and physical demands of the journey.
On the other hand, Hal and Charles are depicted as inexperienced and ignorant of the wilderness. They are more interested in searching for gold than properly caring for their dog team, which includes the protagonist dog, Buck. They mistreat their dogs, overloading and underfeeding them.
Here are a few key differences between Mercedes and Hal/Charles:
1. Attitude and Preparedness: Mercedes shows a lack of understanding and preparedness for the harsh environment they enter, whereas Hal and Charles demonstrate an ignorant and careless attitude towards the realities of surviving in the wild.
2. Motives: Mercedes joins the journey primarily for her personal comfort and luxury, whereas Hal and Charles are driven by the desire for quick riches through the discovery of gold.
3. Treatment of Dogs: Although Mercedes is not directly involved in handling the dogs, she indirectly contributes to their mistreatment by not questioning or stopping her husband's actions. In contrast, Hal and Charles abuse their dog team by overworking, underfeeding, and being generally indifferent to their welfare.
Overall, while Mercedes, Hal, and Charles share certain characteristics like their lack of preparedness, each character differs in terms of their motives, attitudes, and treatment of the dogs. These distinctions contribute to their unique roles and impacts on the story.