Write a report analyzing the treaty agreement ending World War I
Both supporters and opponents of the League of Nations hoped to preserve peace. Using the internet, libraries, or other research sources, identify what each group proposed as a means to secure peace for the United States. Analyze the debate between Wilson and the opponents of the League. Then, construct a series of suggestions for a treaty agreement that would have satisfied both sides. Write a 300-word report that defends your version of the treaty. Use proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling. As Woodrow Wilson, how would you have presented your argument for a just peace rather than a peace of vengeance? Be thorough and persuasive, challenging your arguments with those from the opposing side.
Title: Analyzing the Treaty Agreement Ending World War I: Finding Common Ground for Peace
Introduction:
The treaty agreement ending World War I was a significant turning point in history, shaping the course of international relations and laying the foundation for future peace initiatives. This report aims to analyze the debate between supporters and opponents of the League of Nations, and subsequently present a series of suggestions for a treaty agreement that could have satisfied both sides. Additionally, this report will explore how Woodrow Wilson, as a proponent of a just peace, could have presented his argument persuasively, challenging opposing viewpoints.
Proposals for Securing Peace:
1. Supporters of the League of Nations:
- The establishment of the League of Nations, an international organization aimed at maintaining world peace by promoting diplomacy, arbitration, and collective security.
- Advocating for disarmament and the reduction of military capabilities as a means to prevent future conflicts.
- Encouragement of open diplomacy and dialogue between nations to address concerns and resolve disputes peacefully.
2. Opponents of the League of Nations:
- Emphasizing national sovereignty and independence to avoid entangling alliances that could potentially draw the United States into future conflicts.
- Placing greater emphasis on bilateral treaties and agreements, ensuring that the United States retains control over its own decisions and actions.
- Advocating for a more limited role in international affairs to focus on domestic priorities and interests.
Finding Common Ground:
To formulate a treaty agreement that could satisfy both sides, a balanced approach is required. The following suggestions aim to address the concerns of both proponents and opponents:
1. Maintenance of national sovereignty:
- The United States would reserve the right to make independent decisions on matters of national interest without undue influence from international bodies while respecting the sovereignty of other nations.
2. Collective security:
- The treaty would establish a League of Nations-inspired organization where nations would collaborate on matters of global importance, allowing for the exchange of ideas, peaceful negotiations, and the pooling of resources to address common challenges.
3. Disarmament and military limitations:
- The treaty would call for the gradual reduction of military capabilities among signatory nations, thereby promoting peace while recognizing the need for self-defense.
Presenting the Argument for a Just Peace:
As Woodrow Wilson, I would have argued for a just peace as opposed to a peace of vengeance in the following ways:
1. Emphasizing the importance of building a lasting peace based on mutual understanding, respect, and cooperation, rather than perpetuating cycles of violence.
2. Highlighting the fundamental principles of self-determination and equal rights for all nations, aiming to create a world order that guarantees fairness and justice.
3. Arguing that by engaging in international affairs and promoting diplomacy, the United States can play a critical role in preventing future global conflicts.
Conclusion:
Finding a balance between proponents and opponents of the League of Nations was crucial in formulating a treaty agreement ending World War I. By embracing compromise and addressing the concerns of both sides, a treaty that aimed to secure peace and protect national interests could have been achieved. Woodrow Wilson's vision of a just peace provided a comprehensive framework, highlighting the importance of diplomacy, self-determination, and international cooperation in forging a brighter and more stable future for all nations.
No one here will write your assignment for you.
However, if you post what you write (no rough drafts, please), someone may be able to critique your thinking and writing for you.
Here are some websites to get you started:
https://www.google.com/search?q=how+to+research&oq=how+to+research&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i65.3440j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
https://scholar.google.com
https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_style_introduction.html