(True or False) Both restitution and compensation come from the offender.
I think its true.
I agree.
Actually, that statement is false. While restitution and compensation are both related to correcting harm caused by an offender, they originate from different sources.
Restitution is a form of payment made by the offender to directly reimburse the victim for any financial losses or damages incurred as a result of the crime. It aims to restore the victim to the position they were in before the offense occurred. For example, if someone vandalized a car, they might be required to pay for the repair costs.
On the other hand, compensation is typically provided by the state or a relevant fund to assist victims when the offender is unable or unwilling to provide restitution. It serves to address the financial, emotional, or physical suffering endured by victims and is generally awarded in cases where restitution is not feasible or sufficient.
So, while restitution does involve the offender reimbursing the victim, compensation may come from a different source altogether.