Fundamental human right are said to be inalienable, discuss the limitations of human right

Human rights exist in subjective terms, therefore they are often violated without consequence. If human rights are guaranteed by a state, its citizens are limited to the rights the state defines as inalienable.

Also see related questions below.

My freedom to swing my arm ends at your nose.

alienable fundamental rights to whichie inherently entitled sumply because he or she is a human being.

Human rights are considered essential and universal, belonging to every individual without discrimination. They are meant to be inherent and inalienable, meaning that they cannot be taken away or arbitrarily denied. However, it is important to recognize that certain limitations exist on human rights. These limitations generally arise as a result of conflicts with other rights, the need to protect public interests or national security, or when rights are abused or misused.

Here are some key limitations on human rights:

1. Legal and Legislative Limitations: Governments may impose restrictions on certain rights to uphold the rule of law and maintain public order. For example, freedom of speech may be limited by laws prohibiting hate speech or incitement to violence.

2. National Security: Governments have a responsibility to protect their citizens from internal and external threats. However, sometimes measures taken in the name of national security can infringe upon individual rights, such as privacy or freedom of movement.

3. Public Health and Morality: In certain situations, governments may limit individual rights to protect public health or maintain social order. For example, during a pandemic, restrictions on movement or gatherings may be imposed to safeguard public health.

4. Balancing of Rights: Sometimes, there may be conflicts between different rights, and it becomes necessary to strike a balance. For instance, freedom of expression may clash with the right to privacy in cases involving the publication of private information.

5. Non-Discrimination: Human rights should be universal and apply to everyone, but there are circumstances where certain rights might vary or be denied based on factors like age, gender, race, or citizenship. While these distinctions might be justified in some cases, they can also lead to violations of human rights.

It is crucial to address these limitations carefully and ensure they are justified, proportionate, and necessary. When considering limitations on human rights, it is essential to weigh the potential harm to individuals against the greater good or protection of society as a whole. Human rights should not be unduly restricted, and any limitations should be subject to review and oversight to prevent abuse.