1. Which of the following examples are allowed under the Lemon test? Select all that apply.

(2 points)Unselected answer

(0 pts) financial aid for religious literature for religion classes in parochial schools

Partially correct answer (1 pt) financial aid for student lunches in parochial schools

Unselected answer (0 pts) financial aid for religious icons and statues in parochial schools

Partially correct answer (1 pt) financial aid for vision testing in parochial schools

2 /2 points

2. In Holt v. Hobbs, what did the Supreme Court use as a basis for its decision?

(1 point)Unselected answer (0 pts) Holt was not a member of a recognized religion.
Unselected answer (0 pts) The government was preventing Holt from practicing his religion.
Unselected answer (0 pts)
The prison had a compelling interest in facilitating prisoner identification and stopping the flow of contraband.
Correct answer (1 pt) The prison had failed to show its policy was the least restrictive means of furthering its compelling interest.

1 /1 point

3. Which of the following does the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment protect?

(1 point)Unselected answer (0 pts) teacher-led prayer in schools
Correct answer (1 pt) attending church
Unselected answer (0 pts) the establishment of a state religion
Unselected answer (0 pts) nurses reading the Bible to patients in a public hospital

1 /1 point

4. How is the French practice of the separation of church and state different from the American practice?

(1 point)Correct answer (1 pt) The French practice bans religious expression in public.
Unselected answer (0 pts) The French practice bans any private religious ceremonies.
Unselected answer (0 pts) France considers Catholicism its state religion.
Unselected answer (0 pts) France does not allow people who practice religion to hold positions in government.

1 /1 point

The final score is 5/5 (100%).

1. B and D
2. D
3. B
4. A

To answer question 1, we are asked to identify which examples are allowed under the Lemon test. The Lemon test is a three-part test used by the Supreme Court to determine if a law violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. Let's analyze each option:

Financial aid for religious literature for religion classes in parochial schools: This option seems to support the teaching of religion in parochial schools, which may violate the Establishment Clause. This is not allowed under the Lemon test.

Financial aid for student lunches in parochial schools: This option does not involve the teaching of religion but rather supports students' basic needs. It does not violate the Establishment Clause and is allowed under the Lemon test.

Financial aid for religious icons and statues in parochial schools: This option involves supporting religious symbols in parochial schools, which may have religious connotations and could violate the Establishment Clause. This is not allowed under the Lemon test.

Financial aid for vision testing in parochial schools: This option does not involve the promotion of religion but rather supports students' health and well-being. It does not violate the Establishment Clause and is allowed under the Lemon test.

Based on the analysis above, the examples allowed under the Lemon test are financial aid for student lunches in parochial schools (option B) and financial aid for vision testing in parochial schools (option D).

Moving on to question 2, we are asked about the basis for the Supreme Court's decision in Holt v. Hobbs. In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that the Arkansas Department of Correction's grooming policy, which prohibited a Muslim inmate from growing a half-inch beard in accordance with his religious beliefs, violated the inmate's rights under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). The Court based its decision on the fact that the prison had failed to show that its grooming policy was the least restrictive means of furthering its compelling interest. Therefore, the correct answer is that the prison had failed to show its policy was the least restrictive means of furthering its compelling interest (option D).

For question 3, we are asked about the protection of the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. The Free Exercise Clause protects individuals' rights to freely exercise their religion. Among the options given, attending church is an example of freely exercising one's religion and is protected under the Free Exercise Clause. Hence, the correct answer is attending church (option B).

Lastly, regarding question 4, we are asked to compare the French practice of the separation of church and state with the American practice. The correct answer is that the French practice bans religious expression in public (option A). In France, there is strict secularism, known as laïcité, which separates religion from the public sphere and restricts religious expression in government-related matters. This is different from the American practice, where the separation of church and state maintains neutrality towards religion but allows for religious expression in public as long as it does not violate the Establishment Clause.

Therefore, the correct answers for all the questions are:

1. B and D
2. D
3. B
4. A