The procession was temporarily abolished because of the emperor’s interest in _____ (1 point)
A.wars.
B.viands.
C.bicycles.
D.poisons.
I'll be happy to comment on what you think.
bicycles, I'm 100% sure ss long as this is the "From Emperor to Citizen" short story
Bicycles
To determine the correct answer, we need to understand the meaning of the word "procession" and consider the possible reasons for temporarily abolishing it due to the emperor's interest.
A procession refers to a formal or ceremonial group moving together in an organized manner, often accompanied by music and specific rituals. It can be related to events like parades, religious ceremonies, or royal celebrations.
Now, let's analyze each option and determine if it aligns with the reasoning behind temporarily abolishing the procession due to the emperor's interest:
A. Wars: The interest in wars by the emperor would not typically lead to the temporary abolition of a procession. Wars involve military strategies, battles, and conflicts, which are separate from the ceremonial aspect of a procession.
B. Viands: The term "viands" refers to food, especially a variety of dishes. While the emperor's interest in food might represent his involvement in banquets or feasts, this does not explain why the procession would be temporarily abolished.
C. Bicycles: The interest in bicycles is an unlikely reason to temporarily abolish a procession. Bicycles are a means of transportation and recreation, but they do not directly relate to the ceremonial or traditional significance associated with a procession.
D. Poisons: Given the negative connotation associated with poisons, it seems unlikely that the emperor's interest in poisons would lead to the temporary abolition of a procession. Poisons typically do not have a direct connection to the ceremonial or formal aspects of a procession.
Considering the above analysis, none of the given options (A, B, C, D) seem to relate directly or adequately justify the temporary abolition of the procession. It is therefore possible that the correct answer is not among the choices provided, or there might be additional context or information required to understand the specific reason for this abolition.