history

posted by .

According to the doves(people opposed to the Vietnam war) answer this question.

Was the motive for US involvement in Vietnam primarily to help the average South Vietnamese citizen or was it primarily to gain a power advantage over Russia and China? That is, did US leaders care about the S.V. or were the S.V just pawns on the power struggle with Russia and China.


I think that the doves would say that it wasn't truley for the South Vietnamese but ratherfor the US's personal gain. IS this correct? What do you guys think?

  • history -

    Are you sure there's only one right answer?

  • history -

    There is a general answer if you look from the doves perspective

  • history -

    Originally, President Kennedy sent advisors there to prop up President Theiu from guirellas, at the request from top management of Firestone Rubber. They had a lot of rubber plantations there, and did not want to lose them. As the situation detoriated in 64, more troops were needed, and During the Goldwater Campaign for President, some political groups raised the spectre of the Red Army spreading worldwide...words such as barrier, protect SE asia were used. The "patriotic", but natiolistic arguements ensured supporting large forces, as it was a National need, and we had to stop the commies. Part of that argument had to do with saving face also, in my opinion.
    I don't personally many leaders in the US were concerned for the citizens of South Vietnam, or North Vietnam, for that matter. They were "pawns", in your terminology.

Respond to this Question

First Name
School Subject
Your Answer

Similar Questions

  1. American History

    Critics of American policy in Vietnam claimed all of the following except that a. the war was a civil conflict in which the United States had no part. b. the president had subverted the role of Congress in declaring war. c. the North …
  2. history/vietnam war

    After the fall of Saigon in 1975, Americans drew very different “lessons” from the experience of defeat in Vietnam. Analyze how the country polarized politically around some of the meanings and “lessons” of the Vietnam War?
  3. us history vietnam war

    How did President Kennedy respond to the news that the Viet Cong were winning their war against the non-communist government of South Vietnam?
  4. English

    Can you please check these sentences? Thank you very much. 1) Vietnam was divided into two parts after World War Two. North Vietnam was communist under the governement of Ho Chi Minh whereas South Vietnam was under control of the US.
  5. ap us history

    criticize my ap us history dbq question that i made for a project During the 1960s, the united states moved from indirect into direct involvement in the vietnam war in order to stop the spread of communism. In light of the following …
  6. SS

    In 1954, the French gave up control of their colony in Vietnam, primarily because of: A. A bloody war for independence fought by Communists under Ho Chi Minh. B. The entry of the United States into the war in Vietnam. C. Invasion by …
  7. Global History

    Vietnam was not originally what France primarily wanted. Explain the value of Vietnam at the time. The time period is around the Vietnam war!
  8. History

    Which statement BEST distinguishes the Viet Cong from the North Vietnamese Army?
  9. U.S. History

    Which statement BEST distinguishes the Viet Cong from the North Vietnamese Army?
  10. U.S. History (Check) (Reed)

    1. When the Vietnam War ended... a) Many Americans wanted to return and win b) Many Vietnamese wanted to leave the county for the safety of America c) Many people still trusted the government and its decisions A: b?

More Similar Questions