although a democracy is based on freedom of expression, most people recognize the need to allow the government to exercise control over such things as false and misleading advertisements of illegal products, Is the banning of cigarette advertising on television consistent with these necessities?is this right if not coorect,Yes it does.
Freedom of speech does not mean that the government can not regulate that speech to a certain degree. The government has a duty to protect the ppl. That is where the cigarette commercial regulation comes into play... not because of adults btw, but because children watch television.
You seem the same thing with certain types of television (adult material) not being allowed during 'prime-time' hours.
can not?
ppl?
where? (should refer to a place)
...?
btw?
Need to explain the last sentence in first paragraph. What do children have to do with this?
seem?
Second paragraph needs MUCH explanation.
The banning of cigarette advertising on television can be seen as consistent with the need to protect the public, particularly children, from false and misleading advertisements of illegal products.
While democracy is founded on the principle of freedom of expression, it does not mean absolute freedom where anything can be advertised without any restrictions. In many democratic societies, there are laws and regulations in place to protect consumers from deceptive and harmful advertising practices.
Cigarettes are known to be harmful to health, and their advertising can potentially mislead people, especially young and impressionable individuals, into believing that smoking is safe or glamorous. Recognizing this, governments have implemented restrictions on cigarette advertising, particularly on television, where it can reach a wide audience including children.
Children are particularly vulnerable to the influence of advertising, and it is important to protect them from exposure to products that could be harmful to their health. Banning cigarette advertising on television helps to reduce the exposure of children to such advertisements, thus serving the needs of public health and protecting the well-being of the younger generation.
It is worth noting that restrictions on advertising do not prevent individuals from expressing their opinions or engaging in discussions about cigarettes and their impact. These regulations are primarily focused on limiting the promotional aspects of advertising, rather than curtailing free expression.
Overall, the banning of cigarette advertising on television can be seen as a necessary measure in a democratic society to protect public health and safeguard the well-being of children.