If Earth took 500 days to orbit the sun instead of 365, how would the seasons be different?

What causes the seasons is the inclination of the axis of rotation of the earth. When the North pole is tilted away from the sun, we have winter up North (summer in Australia). When the North pole is tilted toward the sun, we have summer up North. Exactly in between the two the sun is beside the axis and neither pole points toward the sun, the sun shines on every part of the earth for half a day, and we have the two equinoxes in March and September.

How long it takes to get around has no effect except to make each season proportionately longer.

365 ÷ 4 = ?? (approximate number of days in each season)

500 ÷ 4 = ?? (approximate number of days if the year were longer)

What differences other than the number of days do you think this indicates?

If Earth's orbit around the sun took 500 days instead of the current 365 days, it would have a significant impact on the length and characteristics of the seasons.

To understand how the seasons would be different, we need to look at the factors that determine the seasons: the tilt of Earth's axis and its orbital path around the sun. The axis tilt is responsible for creating the different angles at which sunlight reaches the Earth's surface, causing variations in the intensity of sunlight throughout the year. The orbital path determines the length of the year and affects the duration of each season.

In the current 365-day orbit, Earth experiences four distinct seasons due to its axial tilt. When one hemisphere tilts towards the sun, it receives more direct sunlight, resulting in summer in that hemisphere, while the other hemisphere experiences winter. As Earth progresses in its orbit, the tilt changes, leading to the opposite scenario in the respective hemispheres.

If Earth's orbital period was extended to 500 days, the seasons' duration would be longer. The length of a season is roughly one-quarter of the total orbital period, which means each season would last approximately 125 days. This longer duration would result in more prolonged summers, winters, springs, and autumns.

However, the exact changes in temperature, climate, and weather patterns cannot be determined with certainty because they are influenced by various factors, including the distribution of land and water, ocean currents, and atmospheric conditions.

It's important to note that this hypothetical scenario assumes that the tilt of Earth's axis remains the same. If the axial tilt were to change, it would have a more profound impact on the seasons, potentially altering their characteristics even more significantly.

In conclusion, if Earth's orbit took 500 days instead of 365, the seasons' duration would be extended, resulting in longer summers, winters, springs, and autumns. However, the specific changes in temperature and weather patterns would depend on other factors and cannot be determined with certainty.

im doing a project im looking for the answer

If Earth took 500 days instead of 365 to orbit the sun, how would the seasons be different? Why?

Looking at writeacher's reply, he has brought up resulting changes, such as if summer lasts much longer what will happen to temperatures.