How morally and ethically obligated are leaders to protect the best interest of their followers?
Doesn't that depend upon whether the interest of their followers benefits the people as a whole?
i guess so and does this obligation extend to disobeying questionable orders?
Yes.
Of course, one of the dilemmas for political leaders is when the interests of their many followers conflict.
Determining the extent of moral and ethical obligations that leaders have to protect the best interest of their followers can involve a subjective evaluation. However, there are a few general considerations that can be made:
1. Social contract: Leaders and followers enter into a social contract, wherein leaders are entrusted with the power to make decisions and act on behalf of their followers. This contract implies an obligation on the part of leaders to act in the best interest of their followers.
2. Duty of care: Leaders have a responsibility to ensure the well-being and welfare of their followers. This duty includes protecting their physical safety, promoting their rights and liberties, and working towards their overall well-being.
3. Trust and accountability: Leaders typically have the trust of their followers, and this trust implies an obligation to act in a manner that upholds the interests of those they are leading. Leaders must be accountable for their decisions and actions, ensuring they are aligned with the best interest of their followers.
4. Ethical principles: Leaders should consider ethical principles such as fairness, justice, equality, and respect when making decisions. These principles can guide leaders in prioritizing the best interest of their followers and ensuring that their actions are morally justifiable.
While leaders have moral and ethical obligations to protect the best interest of their followers, it is important to note that the interpretation and implementation of these obligations may vary based on cultural, societal, and personal perspectives. Evaluating specific situations would involve considering these factors and weighing conflicting interests and values.