Jack was told the overall content of his paper was weak. What does this mean?
A. The tone of his paper was not original
B. He had to many grammatical errors
C. The overall ideas in his essay were not fully developed
D. The flow of his essay was inconsistent
You'll remain clueless unless you try to answer these questions yourself. You won't learn anything by copying someone else's answer.
I'll be glad to check YOUR answer.
is the answer D?
To determine the meaning of "the overall content of his paper was weak," we need to analyze the given options and see which one aligns with the concept of weak content.
A. "The tone of his paper was not original" refers to a lack of creativity in the way the paper is written. While this could be a weakness, it does not directly address the overall content.
B. "He had too many grammatical errors" refers to a problem with grammar, which is a separate issue from overall content. Although grammatical errors can weaken the overall quality of a paper, it does not necessarily mean the content itself is weak.
D. "The flow of his essay was inconsistent" addresses the organization and cohesion of the paper's structure. While a lack of flow can affect the overall readability and comprehension, it does not specifically address the content.
C. "The overall ideas in his essay were not fully developed" directly addresses the concept of weak content. If the ideas in the paper were not adequately explored or explained, it suggests that the content lacks depth or substance.
Therefore, the correct answer is C. The overall content of Jack's paper was weak because the ideas were not fully developed.