Explain the Difference during the Roman Empire on what Augustus says about himself and what Tacitus says about Augustus
HOW would you like us to help you with this assignment?
like why would Tacitus put Augustus in a bad line? What changed about Rome because of Augustus?
Tacitus criticized Augustus for becoming a dictator, rather than continuing the tradition of the Republic.
This site has further information.
http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/ancient/tacitus-ann1a.html
thank you
You're welcome.
During the Roman Empire, Augustus was the first emperor and played a significant role in shaping the empire's political and social structure. Augustus had a carefully crafted public image and propaganda machine, emphasizing his achievements and authority. Tacitus, a renowned Roman historian, lived during the reign of the emperors and wrote about events and figures during that time.
To understand the difference between Augustus's portrayal of himself and Tacitus's account of him, one can examine primary sources such as Augustus's own writings, known as Res Gestae Divi Augusti (The Deeds of the Divine Augustus), and Tacitus's works like "Annals" and "Histories". By comparing these texts, we can get insights into the perspectives of both Augustus and Tacitus.
1. Augustus's self-portrayal:
Augustus presented himself as a skillful statesman, emphasizing his role in ending the Roman Republic and establishing the principate, a form of imperial government. In his Res Gestae, he highlighted the restoration of peace and unity within the empire, the expansion of the Roman territories, and his efforts for the well-being of the Roman people. Augustus described himself as a humble servant of the state, emphasizing his adherence to traditional Roman virtues.
To understand Augustus's self-portrayal in his own words, one can refer to translations and interpretations of the Res Gestae Divi Augusti.
2. Tacitus's account:
Tacitus, as a historian, wrote more critically about Augustus and his successors, providing an alternative perspective. His works often portrayed the emperors as oppressive rulers, controlling the political system and undermining the former Republican ideals. Tacitus analyzed Augustus's policies and actions, exploring themes such as the loss of liberty, corruption, and the balance of power. His works aimed to uncover the true nature of Augustus's rule and its consequences for the Roman people.
To access Tacitus's account of Augustus, one can read translated versions of his works, such as "Annals" and "Histories." These narratives offer insight into Tacitus's analysis of Augustus's reign and his interpretation of the emperor's motivations and actions.
By comparing Augustus's own portrayal of himself in the Res Gestae with Tacitus's critical analysis, one can gain a more nuanced understanding of the different perspectives on Augustus during the Roman Empire.