Us constitution

what the United States may have looked like had the Anti-Federalists "won" their points in the ratification debate and the writing of the Constitution

  1. 👍 0
  2. 👎 0
  3. 👁 178
asked by Nina
  1. Here is one place to begin:


    1. 👍 0
    2. 👎 0
  2. If the Anti-Federalists "won" their points in the ratification debate and in the writing of the Constitution, the United States would have undoubtedly looked quite different. First of all, the individual states would have had their own powerful, individual legislature, executive, and judicial branches of government, "under the direction and controul of a supreme federal head for certain defined national purposes" (Roland, 2003: "Brutus": Essay #1). As a consequence, the states would have been able to impose their own taxes, duties, and excises and to go after those who failed to pay their debts to the states. In addition, the states would have had the power "of laying and collecting taxes, duties, imposts, and excises; of regulating trade, raising and supporting armies, organizing, arming, and disciplining the militia, instituting courts, and other general powers" (Roland, 2003: "Brutus": Essay #1). The judicial power of the states would have held precedence over an "inferior court that derived their authority from the United States" (Roland, 2003: "Brutus": Essay #1). Basically, while realizing the importance of having a well-established federal government, the states would have had many more powers and more of a say as to how their state was operated.
    In addition, the individual states would have held more responsibility in matters pertaining to protection and defence of the community. For example, according to an Anti-federalist essay penned by "Brutus", protection and defence "ought to be left to the state governments to provide for the protection and defence of the citizen against the hand of private violence, and the wrongs done or attempted by individuals to each other-protection and defence against the murderer, the robber, the thief, the cheat, and the unjust person, is to be derived from the respective state governments" (Roland, 2003: "Brutus": Essay #7). This way the general government and the individual state governments would be held responsible for securing private and public justice, respectively.
    Moreover, according to another Anti-Federalist essay penned by "Cato" on November 22, 1787, "[t]he most general objections to the first article [of the new government], are that biennial elections for representatives are a departure from the safe democratical principles-of annual ones--that the number of representatives are too few; that the appointment and principles of increase are unjust; that no attention has been paid to either the numbers or property in each state in forming the senate; that the mode in which they are appointed and their duration, will lead to the establishment of an aristocracy" (Roland, 2003: "Cato"). Therefore, the country would have had, like our textbook points out, "smaller electoral districts", more "frequent elections", and there also would be "a large unicameral legislature to provide for greater class and occupational representation" (O'Connor & Sabato, 2009, p. 54).
    Finally, if the Anti-Federalists would have ultimately "won", the military would have consisted of "state militias rather than a national force" (O'Connor & Sabato, 2009, p. 55), which to be honest, could have caused many issues, such as raising the question of who would be ultimately liable for defending the nation as a whole against outside forces. In addition, these state militias would have further alienated each state from the next and thereby the nation would have been slowly pulled apart, which like what would happen less than 100 years later, the country could have been thrown into a civil war.

    O'Connor, K. & Sabato, L.J. (2009). American government: Roots and reform (2009 ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.

    Roland, J. (2003, December 20). Anti-Federalist Papers. EDSITEment.

    1. 👍 0
    2. 👎 0
    posted by Juanita

Respond to this Question

First Name

Your Response

Similar Questions

  1. History

    what the United States may have looked like had the Anti-Federalists “won” their points in the ratification debate and the writing of the Constitution

    asked by Alvin on July 29, 2009
  2. History

    Most Anti-federalists believed that farming should be the basis of the U.S. economy. What can you infer was the reason behind this belief? A.)Most Anti-federalists owned textile factories in New England and needed cotton to

    asked by YRN DJ on November 6, 2015
  3. history

    were anti-federalists mainly southern states, and federalists were northern? did they compromise by federalists adding the bill of rights into the constitution, that way it could be ratified?

    asked by Blaze on September 23, 2013
  4. Politics

    Compare and contrast the views of the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists on the issues of representation, governmental power, size and scope of government, and tyrannical rulers. We know that the Federalists won out in the end.

    asked by Mone on October 13, 2010
  5. U.S History

    Which group believed that failure to approve the Constitution would lead to chaos and mob rule? Federalists**** Anti-federalists 2. Which group believed a strong national government was critical to the country? Federalists***

    asked by Kenxie on June 7, 2015
  6. History

    1.)Which group believed that only a powerful government could safeguard liberty? A.)Federalists B.)Anti-federalists A? 2.)Which group believed that people needed the protection of a national government? A.)Federalists

    asked by YRN DJ on November 9, 2015
  7. History

    The framers of the Constitution began with the famous words, "We the People." Consider whether those words were Federalist or Anti-federalist and what was meant by "the people." Which can you infer about those opening words? A.

    asked by Us History help on October 3, 2017
  8. social studies

    1.The new structure of the government will lead to tyranny. (5 points) Federalists Anti-Federalists

    asked by aliyah on November 10, 2012
  9. politics

    The __________ supported strong state governments because they believed that states would be close to the popular will. A. Federalists B. Anti-Federalists C. people D. opposing parties A?

    asked by bev on September 4, 2015
  10. U.S. History

    this is one of my questions. i have answered it. please add or make changes to this as neccessary. :) WHO ARE THE ANTI-FEDERALIST?EXPLAIN WHAT THEY BELIEVE IN.WHY DID THEY OBJECT TO THE PROPOSED CONSTITUTION? Anti-federalists were

    asked by y912f on January 24, 2009

More Similar Questions